Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators

Hoax Investigation => Hoax Videos => Topic started by: wiZZkIDD on May 17, 2010, 05:16:39 PM

Title: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: wiZZkIDD on May 17, 2010, 05:16:39 PM
[youtube:39a6ymju]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ym0TOnMWhZY[/youtube:39a6ymju]
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: wendst6 on May 17, 2010, 07:15:40 PM
Almost all the images in your video are by me, the whole is not based on your research, you would have the least to mention, and not adorn yourself with borrowed plumes.
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: scorpionchik on May 17, 2010, 11:41:14 PM
What is the name of the song from the very beginning?
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: *Mo* on May 18, 2010, 01:00:14 AM
wiZZkiDD, regarding "one example is that we came to find out that Marlon had a twin brother name Brandon.. I guarantee that hardly anyone knew that before Marlon spoke about it at the Memorial":

I have La Toya's book here, which was printed in 1991, and she writes about Brandon in her book, so that was public knowledge 18 years prior to the memorial.

Page 18:
Quote
A tenth child, Marlon's twin Brandon, died shortly after birth.
[/b]

Quote from: "wendst6"
Almost all the images in your video are by me, the whole is not based on your research, you would have the least to mention, and not adorn yourself with borrowed plumes.
Wendy, great job on the pictures!
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: rag doll on May 18, 2010, 01:02:33 AM
Michael Joe, Michael Joseph and all the "nameless" marvelous boys who may have contributed to "the man" we admire and adore -
God bless them all!***  

@wizzkidd: Great video! Thanks for pointing out the Dangerous cover - very interesting...
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: Styloprincess on May 18, 2010, 02:01:19 AM
great video...thank you for sharing!!
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: Puff on May 18, 2010, 04:27:52 AM
Quote from: "wendst6"
Almost all the images in your video are by me, the whole is not based on your research, you would have the least to mention, and not adorn yourself with borrowed plumes.

Well done Wendy! (http://www.cool-names.net/msn-emoticons-smiley/thumbsup.gif)
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: bubaliciousjlb on May 18, 2010, 08:05:23 AM
great vid. you are so right not a lot of people heard of marlons twin i mean how many people actually read a book by latoya who back then was the least popular jackson. again great vid keep them coming
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: wendst6 on May 18, 2010, 08:25:55 AM
viewtopic.php?f=99&t=6415&start=950 (http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=99&t=6415&start=950)

viewtopic.php?f=99&t=8297&start=350 (http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=99&t=8297&start=350)

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=8297&start=100 (http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=8297&start=100)

viewtopic.php?f=99&t=8297&start=325 (http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=99&t=8297&start=325)

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=138&start=50 (http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=138&start=50)

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7258&start=25 (http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7258&start=25)
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: RK on May 18, 2010, 11:02:57 AM
Well it's 2 in the morning over here and I'm sitting staring and comparing ears on my computor screen. Wendst6 all I can say is wow. Even in the childhood pics it  appears one MJ has finer features and the other has a more masculine face. Shape of lips and set of mouth a little different as well.  So there were def 2 from a very young age[ at least motown era onwards]
My mind is going in all directions at the moment and I gotta say that the thought that one half of the KOP may have died is upsetting me .
Great great work both you guys.
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: jacilovesmichael on May 18, 2010, 11:06:25 AM
If there were 2, it would be sense for it to say "Always great to sing with my brother" on the TII CD/DVD.

I have found myself staring at that multiple times trying to figure out what it means and whether or not it's a typo.

Of course it's not a typo!! Surely someone would catch that mistake before printing millions of copies.
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: whisper on May 18, 2010, 01:12:52 PM
Quote from: "scorpionchik"
What is the name of the song from the very beginning?

" We Be Ballin "
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: Datroot on May 18, 2010, 01:17:27 PM
Quote from: "bubaliciousjlb"
great vid. you are so right not a lot of people heard of marlons twin i mean how many people actually read a book by latoya who back then was the least popular jackson. again great vid keep them coming


I read it actually and remembered about the twin.
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: wendst6 on May 18, 2010, 03:09:58 PM
I know, thats never it a Double, the face looks the same, which can never be a Double.
And in the 60 years the surgery has not so good.
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: Its her on July 11, 2010, 04:00:07 PM
Quote from: "wiZZkIDD"
[youtube:61bxhw5c]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ym0TOnMWhZY[/youtube:61bxhw5c]
HOLY MOLEY!  This tale just gets deeper and deeper in mystery!  I think you have created more QUESTIONS than answers!! I didn't want to even consider twins or relatives--because of the creepiness of having to figure out which traits of WHICH man, I actually had a fascination for---I don't think a guy would care, but I, as a girl, get creeped out at even the SUGGESTION of "falling for a composite" of two "Keepers".  

People laugh at how serious some of the fans take their "relationship with MJ", but, rumored as one of the (if not THE )most eligible bachelors on Earth, it has been in the back of my mind as a possibility...HEY--- it NEVER ceases to AMAZE me, the way how people "couple up"---how bizarre or unseeming of blissful matches people appear to be in. Never SAY never    :roll: It SO unnecessarily limits your options  :!:  :lol:

But, I have known for years that the life we all heard he lived would have been miserable if really true, so, THAT genius HAD to have found a way to make it less invasive and demanding on him. I was willing to accept that he, as a perfectionist, HIRED or created the exact look he wanted to PLAY his part as needed, in public. We've all seen cheap imitations of the original things in shows--or commercials, like Ronald McDonald---which don't fool anyone older than 4, so ONLY MJ could have found or supervised SUCH CLOSE matches to his own look.

I also don't think it was INTENDED to deceive---a show IS a SHOW(all fabricated), after all, or CERTAINLY, MJ, who misses NOthing, would have addressed "the EAR thing"...

  NO one had a fit when they routinely replaced BATMAN, each film....

But, the thing I have such a problem with is, WHEN did the birth certificate(s) become sealed and WHO thought of/did this?? MJ? How is it that ANYONE had the forethought to a future when this would become profitable???  And, if there have always been TWO of them, why make such a big deal over MJ as a child, refusing to go to South America, that time?

I think I told you before, that I've thought for some time that the real MJ has not changed skin color at all. I thought he was wearing makeup to throw everyone off, so he could hire boyish--never-aging white doubles to play him in his teenybopper shows--having been quoted/MISquoted as stating once, that if only he were eternally young and white, he could REALLY clean up!  :lol:

 You did a GREAT job!!  8-)  8-)  8-) I've never seen many of these pictures!!!

There is WAY more than you mentioned on that DANGEROUS cover, but I think it deserves it's own thread. I'll post my thoughts there, if there already is one, and if not, I'll begin one. This hoax has tentacles longer than anyone can imagine. :o It makes me wonder if we are NOT dealing with one genius--but TWO. Remember when MJ kept saying he was SO lonely all the tiime?  Twins supposedly become particularly lonely when apart from one another...of COURSE they could NEVER be seen in public TOGETHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I bet one headed up the East operation and one headed up the West!! (because they ARE noticeably different---I don't think a SINGLE intellect would have made the extra work or expense, to market the same brand differently across the ocean... ;)  ;) All this time!!

NOW, Dude, you got me :idea:  :idea:  wondering if that's why MJ appeared to go back a second time, BACK to see the Elephant Man's bones in that London Hospital/museum...SO AS NOT TO BE SEEN TOGETHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :o  :o  :shock:
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: liegi on July 11, 2010, 04:24:59 PM
Wendy,
I enjoyed your video very much (I have seen the others).  
I wonder if we are shocked because we realize we have been fooled all this time.  This shows us how hard it is to know what is REAL.  
Could this be the reason for the hoax?  This Is IT--Greatest declaration of freedom, The Man We Never Knew.  Michael was tired of the charade.
Do you think Brandon didn't die and substituted Michael?  
What I can't figure out is why no one in the media has picked up these differences in appearance.
A lot of people have wondered how Michael will come back.  Maybe it will be a video where he reveals the hoax. His brother died and he will also reveal how the media has never picked up on this.
Another instance of two Michaels--the Bashir interview.  There were at least two Michaels I think.
Thank you.
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: mjkate on July 11, 2010, 08:14:30 PM
thank you to everyone for all of this hard work! I have been killing my brain cells for a year trying to noodle this around. I do believe that all of this research is going to lead us where Michael intended and we will have our answers. It won't bother me in the slightest if there are 2 because both of them seem to be cut from the same cloth...talented and caring and cute. It is a lot to ask of one person anyway so in the same way the television industry likes to hire twins so that the kids can share the work, we can think the same way about a 45 year long, worldwide bonanza that would be difficult to accomplish even with 2 people. Having said all this I am still as confused as heck!! lol. I have 2 questions for now; are we saying that the "death" is still a hoax or did one of the Michaels actually die and if so which one, the early Michael or the later one (is the later one the one with Vitiligo?) If no one actually died then I am even more confused....did they just want to put an end to it for both of them and if so I am still confused about the funeral and memorial pictures - what is the significance of the pictures exactly? This was the transition period I get that but does that picture represent the king of pop (because it's after Thriller and Bad and then the next chapter begins) and that the king of pop is gone...or did the Michael in that picture (who I think is the early Michael) really die.......K that was all my first question...........second question - who is the father of the children both or Michael Joseph Jackson (the later years Michael) omgosh I am so grateful for all of you. Without you guys to talk to I would have no one who understands!!!!
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: Its her on July 15, 2010, 07:09:51 PM
Quote from: "wiZZkIDD"
[youtube:e8exyj4h]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ym0TOnMWhZY[/youtube:e8exyj4h]
I guess I'm going backwards, again, on this twin thing. Someone help me sort this out.

ALL of the pictures of "MJ" taken in the red shirt that he wore in the Liberian girl and the 2300 Jackson Street videos, and ALL the pictures taken this same time, with the big 80's hair and heartbreaking look in his eyes, ALL the times he is captured not smiling...bother me somehow.

This guy actually looks like he's in serious physical pain or his favorite puppy just died--all the while being forced to do this family reunion gathering thing, two videos and, also a photo shoot(in different clothes)---with his mom, dad, Janet, AND Diana Ross, of all people, instead of suffering privately.

These pictures ALWAYs bothered me, but now that you bring up surgically altered doubles or cousins, or an actual twin which we never knew----I've looked at the pix again and there is one which NEVER looked right to me, but I didn't know why--the one with MJ and his Dad. We all heard the stories about how MJ doesn't understand Joe and they argue and there was some distance between them--maybe Joe intimidated MJ as a boy, and he became ill  around him, etc, etc., But that ain't it, in these pictures!

 Joe has a look on his face as when he poses for pictures with strangers!! The SAME "polite", artificial, "company" pose people use when they are posing for pix they would rather not, so they are just being accommodating.

The SAME pose when he and the family did the 70's Life magazine spread, and the ABC interview in the 70s.

SAME fake look he had on his face, when MJ publicly acknowledged his parents, saying he loved them, at the awards ceremony with Eddie Murphy and Elizabeth Taylor.

And the same fake look for the photo shoot. I can't remember the name of the magazine, right now.

This picture with his Dad, (which is in wiZZkiDD's video somewhere, here, or maybe the MJ Prestige one :? ) always felt "uncomfortable”, because MJ looks to be in SUCH pain, and Joe looks like he's just fake-happily posing with a stranger.

Joe looks like he's posing FOR a photographer he doesn't know, WITH someone he's JUST met! :?  AS, incidentally, he looks in the photograph with one of MJ's blonde girlfriends...he is posing with a stranger!

Now, is this guy—with the different ears, you pointed out, A TWIN or a DOUBLE? Or, is he on medication which renders him very docile and backwardly shy, at almost thirty, so he NEEDS to be replaced, if the act is to continue??

I don't wish to be :oops:  invasive or trespass :oops:  on things which are no one's business.  I just want to know WHO THIS particular version of MJ IS...

Is this the one who went into the background all these years while the double took his front stage place? Or was this guy sad because he was,  somehow, ill and had to retire in his 20s? Was the memorial and all of it to recognize the REAL one finally, and be able to explain WHY he had to disappear from the public?

I know identical twins like to FOOL people. :o  :?  :roll:  This whole thing is so bizarre, it's probably just a stall tactic to buy MJ more time and keep us busy chasing our tails, so OTHER fans can get up to speed.

Any thoughts as to why he looks so godawful sad in ALL of the photos (taken that day), if he's about to make billions of dollars subbing part time, for the great Michael Jackson?????

I always thought it was unusual that MJ didn't sing, dance or even walk or talk in the Liberian Girl video OR the 2300 Jackson Street video (which I couldn't find online anymore, but I've been having computer problems, so IDK...)

According to the rules of doubles, only the real one gets to do the complex animated stuff---and the double is just sort of a breathing prop, or place holder. UNLESS the double is a completely trained understudy... A relative may have had similar voice properties, enough to fake a few words, like, “That's a wrap”...but mostly THIS guy doesn't say a lot, until he goes to the awards show and thanks about 8 people.

I am going over everything I thought I knew about MJ, and, until the ear thing came up, I knew there could be only ONE Michael Jackson. Ears grow longer withYEARS of  age, but the shape NEVER changes by itself.

Now I just don't know... HOW could there be twins? Paparazzi were everywhere. Even MJ could not have hidden twins. There would have been pictures of twin boys together, by the hundreds. That's what people DO with twins! Unless the other brother was somehow sickly or damaged, he would have been in hundreds and hundreds of “TWIN” pictures, dressed just alike, not to mention school pictures before they necessarily had to leave school because of their fame...

A twin brother for MJ does not fly. There would be family reunion pix, in uncles' and aunts' movie cameras, and pix taken on the street, at church, carnivals, etc,. before the fame hit.

 It does not fly. Now...someone who looks like MJ IS paired up with Janet quite a bit....

It COULD sort of work, if Janet had a twin brother...that would explain some of why “MJ” in Taraborelli's book, went so berzerk when she sneaked off and got married...twins share all secrets, usually. If he took the bond more seriously than she did, it WOULD shake him up.

Do you think JANET could have had a twin which could have looked enough like MJ that it was HE who was elected to double for MJ, later??

When is Janet's birthday?  :o

Just streaming here. Or going nuts....
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: Its her on July 15, 2010, 07:19:42 PM
Quote from: "jacilovesmichael"
If there were 2, it would be sense for it to say "Always great to sing with my brother" on the TII CD/DVD.

I have found myself staring at that multiple times trying to figure out what it means and whether or not it's a typo.

Of course it's not a typo!! Surely someone would catch that mistake before printing millions of copies.


It COULD be a typo...MJ, the perfectionst doesn't do, or oversee EVERYTHING in his companies. Once discovered, already gone to press,  they probably wouldn't fix just one little missing "s", until they had another run printed.

Someone on this forum today, I read, said that on the record album, it was changed to state: "brotherS".... MJ probably laughed about it and is just letting the hoax take on a life of it's own, through all our wild imaginations. :lol:  ;)
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: *Mo* on July 16, 2010, 02:47:18 AM
Quote from: "Its her"
Quote from: "jacilovesmichael"
If there were 2, it would be sense for it to say "Always great to sing with my brother" on the TII CD/DVD.

I have found myself staring at that multiple times trying to figure out what it means and whether or not it's a typo.

Of course it's not a typo!! Surely someone would catch that mistake before printing millions of copies.


It COULD be a typo...MJ, the perfectionst doesn't do, or oversee EVERYTHING in his companies. Once discovered, already gone to press,  they probably wouldn't fix just one little missing "s", until they had another run printed.

Someone on this forum today, I read, said that on the record album, it was changed to state: "brotherS".... MJ probably laughed about it and is just letting the hoax take on a life of it's own, through all our wild imaginations. :lol:  ;)

I don't think you realize through how many hands a CD cover design goes before it gets its final approval to be printed.  Several people are involved in the design process, and text is read by several people to correct typos.  After a design is approved, you first get a digital proofing from the printer.  After the digital proofing has been approved, you get a proofing of the actual cover.  I can not imagine that none of the people involved in this process didn't notice there was an 's' missing.  In my opinion, going by my experience, "Always great to sing with my brother" was printed deliberately.
Title: Re: Who is Michael Jackson Investigation part [5]
Post by: mjkate on July 16, 2010, 11:10:15 AM
even if it had been "brotherS" that doesn't make any sense either. For starters he didn't sing on TII with his brothers and even if it had been meant as a general statement MJ had already "died" so wasn't able to make contribution to the cover of a dvd that wasn't meant to exist pre "death".
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal