0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
when TJ first petitioned for guardianship, the judge said that Debbie must be notified
I thought she stepped down from her custody and assigned the right for sole custody to Michael?Why then: Quotewhen TJ first petitioned for guardianship, the judge said that Debbie must be notifiedDoes anyone know?
There may be no biological connection at all. MJ said she was the surrogate mother. Usually a surrogate just carries the baby for the biological mother for whatever reason they have. The eggs from the biological mother are used. In the article it says "gave birth" so this could be a surrogate. The biological mother may not want to be known. But, I guess it's none of our business so I'll leave it at that. It's up to them if they want to say.
Debbie Rowe -- the woman who gave birth to two of Michael Jackson's children -- has filed legal papers saying she SUPPORTS the new joint guardianship arrangement ...
[...]Rowe claims her concern is for the health, safety and well-being of HER children; and says she will continue to ensure their needs are met.[...]
[...]But in the docs, Debbie warns ... "Should the arrangement sought by TJ Jackson and Katherine Jackson become untenable, unstable, unsafe, or in any way contrary to the best interests of the children, Ms. Rowe will seek court intervention."[...]
[...]DivorceAfter Paris' birth, Rowe couldn't bear Jackson any more children. The couple's relationship became strained, and Rowe filed for divorce six months later. In 1999, she accepted a settlement of more than $6 million as well as ownership of the couples' Beverly Hills mansion. In return, Rowe gave up her custodial rights to the children, and agreed to one visit every 45 days. Two years later, she applied to the court to terminate her parental rights completely, claiming it was in the childrens' best interest. During this time, Rowe studied at an online university to earn degrees in criminal law and psychology.In 2005, when Jackson was accused of molesting a young boy, Rowe told the court he was a loving and caring father. During the case she revealed that she had not seen Jackson or her children for several years, which discredited her testimony. Jackson was later acquitted on all counts.Attempt to Restore Parental RightsIn 2006, Rowe took Jackson back to court in order to have her parental rights restored. During the case she also complained that Jackson had stopped paying her. The case was settled out of court. Rowe sold the house shortly after and moved to Palmdale, California, to raise and breed horses. She stayed out of the public eye until June 25, 2009, when her ex-husband died of mysterious causes. In Jackson's will, he named his mother, Katherine, as guardian of his and Rowe's two eldest children. Media reports say that Rowe may contest the decision, although she currently remains silent on the issue.SOURCE: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login