0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
There is no way the "younger" version of these two pics is MJ now... i dont understand!!!!
Quote from: "misha86"He does look older and with make up and touch ups 2 the pictures..maybe even botox he can look like thatAnd u don't have 2 tell me he is human...I know thatAlright.. keep your hair on!!Botox isnt a miracle worker!!!!!
He does look older and with make up and touch ups 2 the pictures..maybe even botox he can look like thatAnd u don't have 2 tell me he is human...I know that
Quote from: "Nakiska"Quote from: "Chuyuri"Those are pictures from the same photoshoot. One has been airbrushed (which is what was done before there was photoshop, and it's also why the "younger" picture looks a little more like a painting than a photo) and the other hasn't. If you believe the '92 conversation with Glenda, MJ even mentions that they airbrushed his face for album covers/magazines, etc.Usually when photos are airbrushed/photoshopped, they often smooth out fine lines, perhaps fill out the brow a bit more, or smooth out the corners of the mouth (as they obviously did here). It's not unusual that any of those differences are there. Also, one picture obviously has a great deal more contrast which emphasizes shadows which could make the face look different.As for the bonus footage picture, I don't know. It looks like an old picture to me.Yes. I believe you are totally right!They are two different pictures taken from the same photoshoot. Michael slightly changed his position while taking the photo and that is why they dont match.And I believe in the convo beteween him and Glenda so this is more confirmation for me. so between 1 second his hair is fuller,hes darker,he looks older,get gets a dimple in his chin and his eyebrows change :lol:
Quote from: "Chuyuri"Those are pictures from the same photoshoot. One has been airbrushed (which is what was done before there was photoshop, and it's also why the "younger" picture looks a little more like a painting than a photo) and the other hasn't. If you believe the '92 conversation with Glenda, MJ even mentions that they airbrushed his face for album covers/magazines, etc.Usually when photos are airbrushed/photoshopped, they often smooth out fine lines, perhaps fill out the brow a bit more, or smooth out the corners of the mouth (as they obviously did here). It's not unusual that any of those differences are there. Also, one picture obviously has a great deal more contrast which emphasizes shadows which could make the face look different.As for the bonus footage picture, I don't know. It looks like an old picture to me.Yes. I believe you are totally right!They are two different pictures taken from the same photoshoot. Michael slightly changed his position while taking the photo and that is why they dont match.And I believe in the convo beteween him and Glenda so this is more confirmation for me.
Those are pictures from the same photoshoot. One has been airbrushed (which is what was done before there was photoshop, and it's also why the "younger" picture looks a little more like a painting than a photo) and the other hasn't. If you believe the '92 conversation with Glenda, MJ even mentions that they airbrushed his face for album covers/magazines, etc.Usually when photos are airbrushed/photoshopped, they often smooth out fine lines, perhaps fill out the brow a bit more, or smooth out the corners of the mouth (as they obviously did here). It's not unusual that any of those differences are there. Also, one picture obviously has a great deal more contrast which emphasizes shadows which could make the face look different.As for the bonus footage picture, I don't know. It looks like an old picture to me.
so between 1 second his hair is fuller,hes darker,he looks older,get gets a dimple in his chin and his eyebrows change :lol:
Quote from: "misha86"so between 1 second his hair is fuller,hes darker,he looks older,get gets a dimple in his chin and his eyebrows change :lol:mjj29081958 has already done me the favor and clarified this for me (thanks, by the way =D ) but just so I make myself clear:The "younger" photo is *airbrushed*. So you have two factors. One, Michael moved between one picture and the next, and two, one picture has been altered. That's not mentioning the contrast issues.If you look CLOSELY, the cleft in his chin is still there in the airbrushed picture. It's more prominent in the non-airbrushed picture because the contrast ratio is higher which emphasizes shadows. His hair looks fuller for the same reason-- contrast brings out the darker aspects of a photo (which is also why his skin looks darker), and because his hair is black, the contrast brought it out. The rest of the differences are airbrushing. Guys, there is *no possible way* for someone to take a new picture that looks *that* similar 20 years after the fact. Some of you are pointing out a couple of easily explainable differences, but I can spot *curls of hair* that are in precisely the same position in both pictures (even some flyaways, and you just can't reproduce that-- ever). I see wrinkles in his clothes that are in precisely the same position. What you're suggesting (that he took a new picture trying to replicate one taken over 20 years ago) is impossible. There's details in those photos that simply can't be duplicated, even if you try.I know you guys want to see clues...but this isn't one.
But why would they use an unairbrushed photo for the funeral instead of the original cover photo??That doesn't make any sense. I'm not sure if it's the recent Michael on that picture. But if it is, it's just another clue. Maybe it's the recent Michael on the unairbrushed photo but they photoshopped it a little so not everybody would notice only for his real fans and believers of the hoax.
Quote from: "Dancing_Machine"But why would they use an unairbrushed photo for the funeral instead of the original cover photo??That doesn't make any sense. I'm not sure if it's the recent Michael on that picture. But if it is, it's just another clue. Maybe it's the recent Michael on the unairbrushed photo but they photoshopped it a little so not everybody would notice only for his real fans and believers of the hoax. I agree. Why wouldn't they use the same picture as Liberian girl in the 1980s? Why did they show this one instead? Because we haven't found out why there was the liberian girl pic instead of a recent one for the funeral yet. That's why this thread makes sense to me because it would be actually a recent picture of Michael..
Quote from: "Chuyuri"Quote from: "misha86"so between 1 second his hair is fuller,hes darker,he looks older,get gets a dimple in his chin and his eyebrows change :lol:mjj29081958 has already done me the favor and clarified this for me (thanks, by the way =D ) but just so I make myself clear:The "younger" photo is *airbrushed*. So you have two factors. One, Michael moved between one picture and the next, and two, one picture has been altered. That's not mentioning the contrast issues.If you look CLOSELY, the cleft in his chin is still there in the airbrushed picture. It's more prominent in the non-airbrushed picture because the contrast ratio is higher which emphasizes shadows. His hair looks fuller for the same reason-- contrast brings out the darker aspects of a photo (which is also why his skin looks darker), and because his hair is black, the contrast brought it out. The rest of the differences are airbrushing. Guys, there is *no possible way* for someone to take a new picture that looks *that* similar 20 years after the fact. Some of you are pointing out a couple of easily explainable differences, but I can spot *curls of hair* that are in precisely the same position in both pictures (even some flyaways, and you just can't reproduce that-- ever). I see wrinkles in his clothes that are in precisely the same position. What you're suggesting (that he took a new picture trying to replicate one taken over 20 years ago) is impossible. There's details in those photos that simply can't be duplicated, even if you try.I know you guys want to see clues...but this isn't one.ok well tell that to jay'z and mariah carey who both remade there album covered from over the years for comercials and mariahs new album..the pictures look exactly like they did when they were first takenand that doesnt make sense for the non airbrushed picture to have a better quality than the airbrushed picture...why would the "younger" air brushed picture look 20 years old?
Also when I say older I mean the one where mike looks older not the original phoyo with him lighterYou still don't make sense..why would they thin out his hair instead of fill it out like in the older photo? And obviously there not the same because we jus listed the differences....and he can have the same clothes and fly aways because they added them 2 the older photo 2 make them look the same..yes the body and flyaways are the same but the face is not..
Quote from: "misha86"Also when I say older I mean the one where mike looks older not the original phoyo with him lighterYou still don't make sense..why would they thin out his hair instead of fill it out like in the older photo? And obviously there not the same because we jus listed the differences....and he can have the same clothes and fly aways because they added them 2 the older photo 2 make them look the same..yes the body and flyaways are the same but the face is not..They didn't thin out his hair. His hair looks different because of the CONTRAST RATIO. I've said it time and again.I'm not making sense? You change your explanation every time I point out that it's impossible for the two pictures to be 20 years apart. You're the one who's not making any sense.
Started by ~Souza~ « 1 2 ... 6 7 » Hoax Pictures
Started by ~Souza~ « 1 2 » The O2 Press Conference
Started by cawobeth « 1 2 3 » Michael Jackson News
Started by lovemj4everandever « 1 2 3 » Other Odd Things
Started by KacyLovesMJ « 1 2 » Other Odd Things