Well, that was short-lived then.
thats ok... the 'real' news scoop that we are waiting for will NEVER be forgotten and be the most shocking in history!
:multiplespotting: :multiplespotting: :multiplespotting:
re: bring from australia, the word SHIT in tittle (and apologies to God for typing that, as I no longer profane) i didnt read it as a negative... i think it is a language thing, that means it could be read in a negative way.... in australia we use the word shit all the time to describe good things...
for example, "im gonna go down to the supermarket to get some shit" (here "shit" means "stuff")
for example when smoking a joint, "thats good shit" (agan, "shit" meaning "stuff")
for example, "its ok, pull your shit together" (meaning get "yourself" together)
and finally...
for example, "after football practice, i am going to go home and wash my shit" (again, "shit" meaning "stuff")
so when i read the title of this article, i read it as "We are here to report all the stuff the media has ignored!!"
I didnt read it as though they were saying the actual content that they were reporting was Shit (negative) or BS...
edit. also no point debating it. but i think it would have been great to have full control over the article. both ways of doing it would have had pros and cons, but at least the site / forum would have been represented the right way.
edit II - and i dont think it would have put MJ in danger of being found... this is a mediocre magazine we talking about, not the CIA