0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
sorry, maybe you misunderstood me. I'm not mocking chris brown...If MJ would be dead, it would be a very nice gestureof chris brownbut my statement is: NO TEARS --> NO DEAD MAN
There are more important things to do than to figure out if Chris Brown was crying or not.. :x WHO CARES???I am still crying EVERY day trying to figure out where the hell MJ is!!!!Now THAT is REAL crying. :cry: :cry: :cry:
i think the point to this was the fact it was man in the mirror which was an MJ song.. therefore it HAD reached out to chris..nothing hoaxy about it.. to be fair.. but still people may wanna talk about it.. look how many irrelevant topics there has been in the past..let people vent guys or whatever if thats what they need.. team work!! p.s it was on E news 2day that he had fake tears to get the audience to feel sorry for him cos of his past.. and MAYBE.. he used the MJ thing to reflect on that.. i mean man in the mirror.. PERFECT FOR REFLECTION TO CHANGE FOR ANYONE or just for publicity.. who knows.. !!
umm okay. so i check perez hilton's website, and i knew he'd have some snide remark about chris brown (he's majorly biased and full on team rihanna). he posted the youtube video of chris's performance with the title, "Michael Jackson + Tears= Chris Brown Comeback?" the 6th comment was this one:[attachment=0:2m1uoabi]Clipboard01.jpg[/attachment:2m1uoabi]after this, perez posted another blog post about chris brown and his fake tears. my point is, i know that news sources look at his blog for tabloid rumors to post as fact. i hope that someone's random blog comment doesn't become the oh-so-credible "witness" that perez and apparently this article base their "fact" on. remember guys, take everything with a grain of salt. even though this isn't a really a big deal, it's just another way to teach ourselves not to believe all the crap and decide for yourself. a "witness" could be someone who just writes something that a blogger thinks is beneficial to their point of view.