Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators
Hoax Investigation => General Hoax Investigation => Other Odd Things => Topic started by: SmellyJelly on April 06, 2010, 01:36:10 PM
-
Michael's poor parents have no money for new clothes, begin to remove the old clothes from naphthalene...
Here's a picture from april 5 , Murray's trial...
(http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/9871/0405jacksonfamilycourts.jpg)
Now, look at these pictures, both from 2005, Michael's child molestation trial.
Ladies first...
(http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/4951/katherinejacksongetscus.jpg)
And the unfailing Joe...
(http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/1682/96911michaeljacksonandf.jpg)
They wear the same outfit.
Some time ago I said the same about Murray.
Here in 2005...
(http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/6074/carnavalmurray0002layerp.jpg)
And here, 2009...
(http://i687.photobucket.com/albums/vv239/AliaXa/murraymercedes.jpg)
Again, the same outfit.
So...they ( the parents and Murray ) love too much their outfits or they have something special about the year 2005?
They want to attract the attention? If so, at what?
And some connections with OJ Simpson.
We have here a picture with him.This is the outfit he wear when he was declared not guilty...
(http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/2905/0401ojsuitexap.jpg)
And now Murray, in February at the trial...suit like OJ's suit...
(http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/5972/article124945308344f9c0.jpg)
And Murray again, in April 5 at the trial....tie like OJ's tie....( sorry I don't have a better picture )
(http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/6500/0406murrayex.jpg)
Murray is OJ's biggest fan or he wants to tell us that he will be declared non guilty?
My favorite part...SMELL LIKE HOAX?
-
Wow!Great post...now this has to means something!
-
I don't think it means something. I also wear the nice clothes for years if i dont grow again. but thats jmo ;) just coincidence.
-
I don't think it means something. I also wear the nice clothes for years if i dont grow again. but thats jmo ;) just coincidence.
Yeah.. but if u r the parent of KING OF POP.. its very very strrange when u weare the same outfit at the same situation..
MURRAY represents MJ
MJ told his parents: Mom, Joe.. I am gonna destroy the media.. do u wanna help?
-
I don't think it means something. I also wear the nice clothes for years if i dont grow again. but thats jmo ;) just coincidence.
Yeah.. but if u r the parent of KING OF POP.. its very very strrange when u weare the same outfit at the same situation..
MURRAY represents MJ
MJ told his parents: Mom, Joe.. I am gonna destroy the media.. do u wanna help?
And they both wear the same outfit... thats even more strange.. when it was just one of them.. that would be nothing... but they both wear the same outfit
-
I find it so interesting that Joe and Katherine are wearing the same outfits as for the 2005 trial, this whole hoax has been about symbolism and so I think that this is again. The fact that they are wearing the same clothes is to draw attention to the reasons behind this whole thing the i.e. Murrys trial dates 5/4 and 14/6 everything is pointing us towards the trial. We need to think more about this in my opinion. Its not that they cannot afford new clothes it is what these clothes represent. Makes me kinda wonder what will be the outfits for 14/6?
Feel free to express opinions.
Did you also see Dr Murray was wearing a "yellow" tie yesterday so he wore "red" tie for the first hearing and "yellow" for yesterdays hearing is this again symbolism and what should it represent? memorial was red ties and red roses, funeral was yellow ties and yellow and white flowers? :?
:roll:
-
I find it so interesting that Joe and Katherine are wearing the same outfits as for the 2005 trial, this whole hoax has been about symbolism and so I think that this is again. The fact that they are wearing the same clothes is to draw attention to the reasons behind this whole thing the i.e. Murrys trial dates 5/4 and 14/6 everything is pointing us towards the trial. We need to think more about this in my opinion. Its not that they cannot afford new cloths it is what these clothes represent. Makes me kinda wonder what will be the outfits for 14/6?
Feel free to express opinions.
Did you also see Dr Murray was wearing a "yellow" tie yesterday so he wore "red" tie for the first hearing and "yellow" for yesterdays hearing is this again symbolism and what should it represent? memorial was red ties and red roses, funeral was yellow ties and yellow and white flowers? :?
:roll:
This Hoax IS GETTING EASY NOW!!! THis are FACTS!!!!!
First we tought they are all coincidence... But not anymore!! they are pure, hard FACTS!
-
I don't think it means something. I also wear the nice clothes for years if i dont grow again. but thats jmo ;) just coincidence.
Yeah.. but if u r the parent of KING OF POP.. its very very strrange when u weare the same outfit at the same situation..
MURRAY represents MJ
MJ told his parents: Mom, Joe.. I am gonna destroy the media.. do u wanna help?
And they both wear the same outfit... thats even more strange.. when it was just one of them.. that would be nothing... but they both wear the same outfit
Exactly...both of them!This can't be coincidence :shock:
-
There have been too many coincidences in this case, MJ's parents both wearing the same outfit to another court case!! My grandmother had a blue dress like this one that she wore to 2 weddings, now this is normal behaviour for a working class woman not a woman who is loaded with cash and the most famous man in the worlds mother, she is wearing the exact same dress to another court case which involves her son.
This is far from a coincidence!!
There have been hints/clues/slip ups since June 25th and this imo is a big clue.
-
no accident, it symbolizes something :!: :!: :!: ;)
-
There have been too many coincidences in this case, MJ's parents both wearing the same outfit to another court case!! My grandmother had a blue dress like this one that she wore to 2 weddings, now this is normal behaviour for a working class woman not a woman who is loaded with cash and the most famous man in the worlds mother, she is wearing the exact same dress to another court case which involves her son.
This is far from a coincidence!!
There have been hints/clues/slip ups since June 25th and this imo is a big clue.
ONE THING I AM SURE ABOUT IT is!!! MJ NOTICED ''US'.. THATS FOR SURE
-
lol this is exactly what i said when i was watching it live on et, joe n katherine wearing the same clothes from the trial the only other person missing was mike :P
-
Deja Vu rings a bell......
Murray does represent MJ.....Murray IS MJ. We're living this all over again, except this time we're on to the media!
...wait a sec....didnt we just say that? :lol:
-
That is strange ,same outfits five years apart.
-
Deja Vu rings a bell......
Murray does represent MJ.....Murray IS MJ. We're living this all over again, except this time we're on to the media!
One of the major break throughs was spotting Coca Cola was an obvious product placement story.. a false story to advertised Coca Cola. That was an eye opener for me.
-
Deja Vu rings a bell......
Murray does represent MJ.....Murray IS MJ. We're living this all over again, except this time we're on to the media!
One of the major break throughs was spotting Coca Cola was an obvious product placement story.. a false story to advertised Coca Cola. That was an eye opener for me.
Yeah I agree with both if you 100%, my eyes are wide open and I can't wait to see what's going to happen!
-
At the beggining maybe we're afraid to beleive in those symbols . But not anymore !
Things are more than crystal clear when you see Mama Jackson to do this ... :shock:
I hope that the history will have the same happy end ! ;)
BTW why Murray was wearin shades in the courtroom ? 8-)
-
I'm not so sure about the OJ-connection.. But Katherine and Joe definately have something going on with those clothes!! And the CM-issue of same clothes I remember. But putting it next to Mr. and Mrs. Jackson just puts it in an all new perspective!! :P
-
There have been too many coincidences in this case, MJ's parents both wearing the same outfit to another court case!! My grandmother had a blue dress like this one that she wore to 2 weddings, now this is normal behaviour for a working class woman not a woman who is loaded with cash and the most famous man in the worlds mother, she is wearing the exact same dress to another court case which involves her son.
This is far from a coincidence!!
There have been hints/clues/slip ups since June 25th and this imo is a big clue.
ONE THING I AM SURE ABOUT IT is!!! MJ NOTICED ''US'.. THATS FOR SURE
why has mj noticed us
dim person here
-
These things cannot be coincidences....Of coures this has a meaning.
Michael was found not guilty in that trial and I think the same thing will happen with Murray.
-
I'm not so sure about the OJ-connection.. But Katherine and Joe definately have something going on with those clothes!! And the CM-issue of same clothes I remember. But putting it next to Mr. and Mrs. Jackson just puts it in an all new perspective!! :P
I totally agree!! :lol: at CM's Nike shirt - We already have Coca Cola, now there's Nike...so which brand is going to advertise next in this hoax? :lol:
-
i was wondering - you know orange pants mike in TII are they really red and are they the red pants in thriller
-
I also agree that this is a big clue to show us that Murray's trial is just like MJ's 2005 trial. Most people have already found Murray guilty in their eyes. MJ is trying to show us that it is easy to convict an innocent man without having "real"evidence! In the end..."the truth will prevail!" :D
-
This is indeed strange.
-
Katherine with the same blue clothes on
19.April 2005:
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/LpT2EtWH ... ne+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/LpT2EtWHnu-/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues/DbO4FrQSLBJ/Katherine+Jackson)
03.March 2005 :
http://msnbcmedia4.msn.com/j/msnbc/Comp ... .widec.jpg (http://msnbcmedia4.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050303/050303_jackson_vmed_10a.widec.jpg)
Joe is very often wearing a black jacket and a red tie...very often...
Also at the trial in 2005 :
14.March 2005
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/SyMTbFx8 ... oe+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/SyMTbFx8ZMC/Jackson+Trial+Continues/1Rf9rNrQezk/Joe+Jackson)
23.March 2005
http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/524715 ... 4B24B4128C (http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/52471565.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF878921F7C3FC3F69D929FD22BAC72909971709A43F2DD46F1302A99260B5A51110C624F06BF04B24B4128C)
I don't know if it is a clue...
-
I also agree that this is a big clue to show us that Murray's trial is just like MJ's 2005 trial. Most people have already found Murray guilty in their eyes. MJ is trying to show us that it is easy to convict an innocent man without having "real"evidence! In the end..."the truth will prevail!" :D
I got goosebumps when you said that!
You have a very good point!
-
The OJ/Murray thing might be a bit of an irrelevant stretch...
BUT Katherine and Joe are wearing the EXACT OUTFITS as they did for Michael's trial. That CANNOT be a coincidence. Do you realize how rich they are? And rich people don't like to wear the same outfit twice when they know they will be photographed.
This is DEFINITELY relevant.
-
Katherine in May 2009 before the death.
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/3k-jK1hW ... ne+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/3k-jK1hW0jG/Michael+Jackson+Family+Leaving+Beverly+Hills/G-zQ8kbyI7-/Katherine+Jackson)
So we have 4 times Katherine with the same outfit....
-
Katherine in May 2009 before the death.
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/3k-jK1hW ... ne+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/3k-jK1hW0jG/Michael+Jackson+Family+Leaving+Beverly+Hills/G-zQ8kbyI7-/Katherine+Jackson)
So we have 4 times Katherine with the same outfit....
Debunks this then.. the lady likes to wear the same clothes.
-
Katherine in May 2009 before the death.
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/3k-jK1hW ... ne+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/3k-jK1hW0jG/Michael+Jackson+Family+Leaving+Beverly+Hills/G-zQ8kbyI7-/Katherine+Jackson)
So we have 4 times Katherine with the same outfit....
she has no other clothes :lol:
March 2005
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm3 ... ne+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm384_/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues/YVIFuQ3rORF/Katherine+Jackson)
-
WoW! :o
Great Job!!
-
I think this outfit is one of her favorites..she likes it...she often wears blue clothes, light and darker blue and she looks great in this colour.
No matter how much money you have, if you have a favorite in which you are feeling good, you can wear it for many years.
And i am not sure if it is rearly absolutly the same...
And Joe is rearly often wearing this colours...i saw him in german television and the german media...always in this colours...not absolutly the same jackets, but always the red tie to a dark grey jacket.
-
I think this outfit is one of her favorites..she likes it...she often wears blue clothes, light and darker blue and she looks great in this colour.
No matter how much money you have, if you have a favorite in which you are feeling good, you can wear it for many years.
And i am not sure if it is rearly absolutly the same...
And Joe is rearly often wearing this colours...i saw him in german television and the german media...always in this colours...not absolutly the same jackets, but always the red tie to a dark grey jacket.
Yes, probably.
Plus we have to remember that both Mr. and Mrs. Jackson are a bit older.
Most older people I know do NOT like to shop for new clothes.
They find suitable, COMFORTABLE(very important!), well made items and take care of them.
They usually have specific outfits suitable for certain occasions - Church clothes, visiting the grandkids clothes, bingo night clothes, court clothes, etc.
-
hmm, the same clothes that they wore to the 2005 trial when Michael was found innocent...... now there wearing it to CM's trial? Conrad Murray is innocent.
-
June 14, 2010 = June 13/14, 2005(Michael Jackson NOT GUUILTY. Katherine's clothes is the same as on that day. This information is from someone on twitter, don't quite remember who, but props to them. One Love
-
kudos to Kathryn and Joe for being incredibly awesome, supportive and dedicated parents to all their kids/grndkids and the 'MJ cause'.....they 'have' the most important things in this world...they know clothes are not one of them..
-
I find it so interesting that Joe and Katherine are wearing the same outfits as for the 2005 trial, this whole hoax has been about symbolism and so I think that this is again. The fact that they are wearing the same clothes is to draw attention to the reasons behind this whole thing the i.e. Murrys trial dates 5/4 and 14/6 everything is pointing us towards the trial. We need to think more about this in my opinion. Its not that they cannot afford new clothes it is what these clothes represent. Makes me kinda wonder what will be the outfits for 14/6?
ummmm idk if the number theory still works with this but from the dates you gave of 5/4 & 14/6
14-6=8
5-4=1
8-1=7 :lol:
-
by DancingTheDream ยป Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:12 pm
Hopeless wrote:Katherine in May 2009 before the death.
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/3k-jK1hW (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/3k-jK1hW) ... ne+Jackson
So we have 4 times Katherine with the same outfit....
Debunks this then.. the lady likes to wear the same clothes.
Not debunked...
Not the same outfit. The same color, sort of, but also compare the collar and the pocket openings.
May 2009 before the "death"
(http://www3.pictures.fp.zimbio.com/Michael+Jackson+Family+Leaving+Beverly+Hills+lgEEZvJADn-l.jpg)
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/3k-jK1hW ... ne+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/3k-jK1hW0jG/Michael+Jackson+Family+Leaving+Beverly+Hills/G-zQ8kbyI7-/Katherine+Jackson)
-
From March 2005
(http://www1.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues+_vtEWGy4iFyl.jpg)
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm3 ... ne+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm384_/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues/_vtEWGy4iFy/Katherine+Jackson)
Not the same outfit.
She wore the same outfit to both trials, but she did not wear it that day in May, 2009.
-
From March 2005
(http://www1.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues+_vtEWGy4iFyl.jpg)
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm3 ... ne+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm384_/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues/_vtEWGy4iFy/Katherine+Jackson)
Not the same outfit.
She wore the same outfit to both trials, but she did not wear it that day in May, 2009.
looks like a MJ double.
-
Well, I guess we all have a sort of "symbolic wardrobes"...most of the time, we DO decide what we should wear..especially on significant occasions! ;)
-
From March 2005
(http://www1.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues+_vtEWGy4iFyl.jpg)
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm3 ... ne+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm384_/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues/_vtEWGy4iFy/Katherine+Jackson)
Not the same outfit.
She wore the same outfit to both trials, but she did not wear it that day in May, 2009.
looks like a MJ double.
it is a double! :idea:
-
From March 2005
(http://www1.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues+_vtEWGy4iFyl.jpg)
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm3 ... ne+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm384_/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues/_vtEWGy4iFy/Katherine+Jackson)
Not the same outfit.
She wore the same outfit to both trials, but she did not wear it that day in May, 2009.
looks like a MJ double.
it is a double! :idea:
Look how dark MJ's right thumb nail is. I don't think it's a double.
-
From March 2005
(http://www1.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues+_vtEWGy4iFyl.jpg)
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm3 ... ne+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm384_/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues/_vtEWGy4iFy/Katherine+Jackson)
Not the same outfit.
She wore the same outfit to both trials, but she did not wear it that day in May, 2009.
looks like a MJ double.
it is a double! :idea:
Look how dark MJ's right thumb nail is. I don't think it's a double.
And the jaw line too, it's MJ !
-
Guys, no offence, but not EVERYTHING has to be a clue. I know people who have plenty of money who wear the same outfit more than once. I really don't think this means anything, JMO.
-
From March 2005
(http://www1.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues+_vtEWGy4iFyl.jpg)
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm3 ... ne+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm384_/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues/_vtEWGy4iFy/Katherine+Jackson)
Not the same outfit.
She wore the same outfit to both trials, but she did not wear it that day in May, 2009.
that's Michael kiss. he is a MJ impersonator. check out his gallery: http://michaelkiss.com/
-
maybe she just has her court dress, stuff she has worn to court and is at the back only to be pulled as and when necessary
-
From March 2005
(http://www1.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues+_vtEWGy4iFyl.jpg)
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm3 ... ne+Jackson (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/1-l7FXm384_/Michael+Jackson+Trial+Continues/_vtEWGy4iFy/Katherine+Jackson)
Not the same outfit.
She wore the same outfit to both trials, but she did not wear it that day in May, 2009.
that's Michael kiss. he is a MJ impersonator. check out his gallery: http://michaelkiss.com/
I thought this pic was from 2005, or am I wrong? Michael Kiss was at 2005 trial? Oxman is over the cop's shoulder.
-
i dont think it's a double, just look at him,it's so Michael, besides I do think Michael will no way send a double to his own trial.
-
i dont think it's a double, just look at him,it's so Michael, besides I do think Michael will no way send a double to his own trial.
I agree.
-
i dont think it's a double, just look at him,it's so Michael, besides I do think Michael will no way send a double to his own trial.
I agree.
if he can get away by fooling the public by using doubles in TII, why not during his trial?
-
i dont think it's a double, just look at him,it's so Michael, besides I do think Michael will no way send a double to his own trial.
I agree.
if he can get away by fooling the public by using doubles in TII, why not during his trial?
because his life depended on it
-
i dont think it's a double, just look at him,it's so Michael, besides I do think Michael will no way send a double to his own trial.
I agree.
if he can get away by fooling the public by using doubles in TII, why not during his trial?
because his life depended on it
well, if he can fool the mass public in TII i'm sure he can fool a small courtroom thank you very much :roll:
-
if he can get away by fooling the public by using doubles in TII, why not during his trial?
because his life depended on it
well, if he can fool the mass public in TII i'm sure he can fool a small courtroom thank you very much :roll:
Well, agree with the arabian nights, besides just look at him,look at his features, his face, it's definitely Michael ,if not i dont know anymore who the real MJ is
-
if he can get away by fooling the public by using doubles in TII, why not during his trial?
because his life depended on it
well, if he can fool the mass public in TII i'm sure he can fool a small courtroom thank you very much :roll:
Well, agree with the arabian nights, besides just look at him,look at his features, his face, it's definitely Michael ,if not i dont know anymore who the real MJ is
MashMike, I agree with you 100%. There is no way Michael would have sent a double to court for him. :roll:
-
Thank u IBelieveInMiracles, it's so him, there is no way a double can look exactly like him, it's our Michael for sure,yeah he used doubles when he didnt wanna go to some parties or other places, when he wanted to be away from the spotlight, but i dont think that he would use a double for such an important event in his life, besides IMO not a single double of him looks exactly like Michael, a double can easily be recognized if he doesnt wear sunglasses.
-
i dont think it's a double, just look at him,it's so Michael, besides I do think Michael will no way send a double to his own trial.
I agree.
Agree!
-
This makes me remember that Michael went one day during his trial in Pyjama:
"...The judge today gave Jackson one hour to appear or be thrown in jail, prompting a nationwide countdown, broadcast live on television.
"I'm issuing a warrant for his arrest and forfeiting his bail," Judge Melville said, speaking over a bid by defence lawyer Tom Mesereau to speak on Jackson's behalf.
"I'll hold the warrant for one hour to give him time to be in court. After that, I'll issue the warrant."
The pop star, who was being treated at a hospital for a back condition, arrived in court wearing pyjamas and looking sedated about two minutes after the deadline passed.
"He was wearing pyjama bottoms and a T-shirt with a jacket over it. And he appeared to be wearing slippers," the court's pool reporter said." http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/20 ... 320868.htm (http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200503/s1320868.htm)
(http://clesnes.blog.lemonde.fr/files/pajama_reuters.jpg)
Maybe this event will be used in a metaphorical way with Murray because I feel it was a hard day for Michael.
-
poor mike as sick as hell and still dragged to court
-
This can't be a coincidence anymore! :D
-
These things cannot be coincidences....Of coures this has a meaning.
Michael was found not guilty in that trial and I think the same thing will happen with Murray.
exactly.!!!!
-
My God !!!!!! Why do all pic's have to be a double ???? Does anyone here even know what Michael looked like. Did the man exist at all? not according to everyone here.
-
My God !!!!!! Why do all pic's have to be a double ???? Does anyone here even know what Michael looked like. Did the man exist at all? not according to everyone here.
Not me :lol: I never believed in that double-blah blah story and I never will.
-
What if they were just her lucky justice clothes. As in Michael got justice the last time she wore them so why not wear it now and it might work again. Also you tend to choose a sober outfit to wear to court and that could be a coincidence too. Remember she did not wear the same outfit in Jan and she has to wear another in June.
-
The double thing is really scary. If Michael really had a double who looked so much like him, could we vouch for the character of the double.
In the case they said Michael was away when the claims were made (esp the magazine issues). The double would have been proximate to kids too in his line of work (acting as Michael) so why could he have not committed the crimes. What would Michael do if he found his double was guilty and bringing him name down because of that. I think going down that road will open up a whole can of worms.