0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Thanks, Libra8 (love the libra name- as I am one.. )Here are some observations/questions I have. -I was confused as she at one point says she is not sure he is in a position to come back (ever), but then keeps emphasizing "big plans," as well as bringing up that he might be directing a movie. I think she really opened herself up to criticism there, as people might say, well, she covered her bases well.-Why did she not mention the name difference on the certificates? - She did not really shed a lot of light or brought info that would convince people. Such as info, evidence we know and have read. Why is that, you think? She talks about the evidence but does not state what it is? Did she just want to bring attention to the fact, but lead people to investigate for themselves?-Why did no beLievers call in? Other than Peter at the end (was that "the Peter" btw? My guess is, yes)-Also, she mentioned one of the executers she believes is defrauding Michael and basically “faked the will” as she put it. I am pretty new to all this – so any pointers as to whom she is referring to (I know I have a 50/50 chance of getting this right.)Thanks!
A bit off topic but since I found it on Twiggy's twitter I will post it here...A JACKSON INSIDER WAS ASKED WOULD MICHAEL JACKSON FAKE HIS DEATH ? " HIS ANSWER: " I WOULDN'T PUT IT PAST HIM TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT"..about 9 hours ago via web
i dont believe she knows some of michael family, she doesn't any proof that she knows them. I could be wrong but i like to see proof :roll: