0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I read an article that said that E'Casenova was asked to do something for Michael 2 weeks before his arrest in 2003 and E'Casenova is 5'11...just sayin
Ok, I hope I do not ruin anything here, but I e-mailed the LA coroner today, asking about the cpr done on the bed and identification. Got this answer :Tina, This is the real report. According to our information initially received we were told that Dr. Murray took him out of the bed at once. It wasn’t until later that the 911 tape came to light. Michael was identified by both his drivers license, fingerprints and by family. Ed Winter, Asst. Chief
Page 41 to 48: NOTE: Hospital, Blood: Tube labelled "Trauma, Gershwin" drawn on 06/25/09 @1330 hoursGershwin? There is no doctor named this at Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Centre. It seems highly unusual that under these circumstances the blood is being labelled with a false name but I guess one never knows.. As in George Gershwin the famous composer?You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Quote from: "Serenitys_Dream"Page 41 to 48: NOTE: Hospital, Blood: Tube labelled "Trauma, Gershwin" drawn on 06/25/09 @1330 hoursGershwin? There is no doctor named this at Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Centre. It seems highly unusual that under these circumstances the blood is being labelled with a false name but I guess one never knows.. As in George Gershwin the famous composer?You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYes, about the tube of blood. In several places I have read that the time "Michael" arrived at UCLA was 1:14 (1314 hours). In the chaos of bringing him into the emergency room, establishing resuscitation efforts, etc., would someone actually have taken a TUBE of blood from his body (if it was labeled 1330 hours, this means the blood would have been taken 16 minutes after he got to UCLA). Would someone actually have had time to think about labeling the tube at this time? Would they have time to think about using a fake name? A TUBE of blood is quite a lot (I recall this from when I have had to give blood for tests, etc.) Does someone with a medical background know if this is really a procedure they would perform on someone during a life or death situation?
In this interview, MJ talks about being interested in anatonomy.. "the brain and the bones"[youtube:9i61qm3l]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlz3BoDrIDA&feature=related[/youtube:9i61qm3l]
Today I finished reading the autopsy results and some things did not seem right.But ofcourse it is just my opinion.The autopsy report stated that in 2009 june his weight was 136lb(61,7 kg) but in 2003 when he was charged with **** he weighed 120lb(54,4 kg) and I strongly believe that in june 2009 Mike was thinner than in 2003 .I am also wondering about his height.....The autopsy report stated that he was 5``9 tall but back in 2003 he was measured 5``11 .HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE...c``mon people he aint no Benjamin Button <!-- s:D --><!-- s:D -->
Quote from: MuinasjutumajaToday I finished reading the autopsy results and some things did not seem right.But ofcourse it is just my opinion.The autopsy report stated that in 2009 june his weight was 136lb(61,7 kg) but in 2003 when he was charged with **** he weighed 120lb(54,4 kg) and I strongly believe that in june 2009 Mike was thinner than in 2003 .I am also wondering about his height.....The autopsy report stated that he was 5``9 tall but back in 2003 he was measured 5``11 .HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE...c``mon people he aint no Benjamin Button <!-- s:D --><!-- s:D -->Yes, the weight seems wrong.Also, if you have seen the extras on the TII DVD, the woman that trained the dancers mentioned at the selection of the dancers that one of the requirements was that they be no taller than Michael. Then she said: so 5'9", 5'10, 5'11. I was thinking at the time, well which is it?
Started by karmaknowstruth Michael Jackson News
Started by letstalkagain Other Odd Things
Started by MJJ1982 TMZ Articles
Started by darkchild Michael Jackson News
Started by MJ_Facts Conrad Murray's Medical Licences