Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators
Hoax Theories => The Double Theory => Topic started by: Jacksonology on April 10, 2010, 03:40:00 PM
-
http://www.lipstickalley.com/f227/blanket-picture-thread-198124/index80.html here is a thread about a possible blanket impersonator! wow even the kids have there own doubles! don't say ''oh it's lighting, oh angle of picture'' he is only 8 years old. He can only change but so much....
-
(http://i080.radikal.ru/1003/87/303e052314e9.jpg)(http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/3137/blanket20jackson202.jpg) obviously to different kids. One is real. One is fake. the real Blanket's chin is Sqaurer like Michael's, the fake one is Circular, Softer. The head shapes are different also. Blanket's is like Michael's Squarer, Dynamic. Fake one is Softer, Rounder.
-
(http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/1010/62cf12aa5b972930a.jpg) Why the shades? Got something to hide? We already saw your face at ''The Memorial''. Double.
-
who the hell is this?(http://i39.tinypic.com/23tgnpv.jpg) (http://sp9.fotolog.com/photo/25/5/125/sweett_hollywood/1269411447910_f.jpg)Looks Mexican if you ask me.
-
Ok another fake and one real: The Real Blanket:(http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/5482/alkhdlfhd.jpg) FAKE:(http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/1050/lshdfljsdhfo.jpg)
-
I'm sorry but to me it all looks like the same kid. Each picture doesn't even look that different from the others. He's making different faces in each one, and even in pictures where he's making the same kind of face, it's from a different angle.
Just my opinion :)
-
I'm sorry but to me it all looks like the same kid. Each picture doesn't even look that different from the others. He's making different faces in each one, and even in pictures where he's making the same kind of face, it's from a different angle.
Just my opinion :)
well, everyone has a opinion. and i believe blanket has a double ;) and no matter what angle a pic is taken, head shapes shouldn't change. ;)
-
Well, in some of those pictures he was younger. When kids are little their faces tend to be rounder, their cheeks are bigger, etc. Plus, he's growing & he's gotten a bit skinnier, causing his face to change a little, his features (chin, jawline, cheekbones, etc.) are becoming more pronounced. It's normal. The thing that never changes in those pictures are the eyes. :shock: It's in the EYES. Those are MJ's eyes, they are unmistakable.
-
I think it's going a little too far to asume that the children have a double or impersonator to be honest. But the possibility could always be there but personally I don't believe it.
-
ok.... right...... ummm.....yeah.... the thought of michael having a double isnt that far-fetched and can be taken....but isnt this going a bit too far?? like really the only way that blanket would have a double is is he was a twin... which he isnt....cant we just leave the kids alone and leave them out of this....
-
maybe the kids had a double for safety reasons. from the mobbbings of the paparazzi or stuff....
-
Well, in some of those pictures he was younger. When kids are little their faces tend to be rounder, their cheeks are bigger, etc. Plus, he's growing & he's gotten a bit skinnier, causing his face to change a little, his features (chin, jawline, cheekbones, etc.) are becoming more pronounced. It's normal. The thing that never changes in those pictures are the eyes. :shock: It's in the EYES. Those are MJ's eyes, they are unmistakable.[/quote how younger can he be!? he's under 10 lmao unless he was 6 or 5 in one of these pics :roll:
-
Actually in the picture where it's the same picture just reflected, he is about 5 or 6 actually :) The second one in this post. He's about 5 or 6
who the hell is this?(http://i39.tinypic.com/23tgnpv.jpg) (http://sp9.fotolog.com/photo/25/5/125/sweett_hollywood/1269411447910_f.jpg)Looks Mexican if you ask me.
[/quote]
-
the ones that show him on what looks to be a webcam.... i dont think they are even him.... there probably just some kid posing as blanket on the internet... i dont think that even at that age he is computer smart
-
the ones that show him on what looks to be a webcam.... i dont think they are even him.... there probably just some kid posing as blanket on the internet... i dont think that even at that age he is computer smart
exactly. DOUBLE ;)
-
Sorry, I don't think the kids have doubles!
What kind of parent would even let his kid be a double for them and be put in danger of a possible kidnapping!! :roll:
Those pics are all cute little Blanket to me!
-
the ones that show him on what looks to be a webcam.... i dont think they are even him.... there probably just some kid posing as blanket on the internet... i dont think that even at that age he is computer smart
exactly. DOUBLE ;)
ahhh maybe i didnt explain it right...... the kid isnt posing as a Double.... The kids dont have Doubles..... im just saying its some silly kid messing around on the internet
-
the ones that show him on what looks to be a webcam.... i dont think they are even him.... there probably just some kid posing as blanket on the internet... i dont think that even at that age he is computer smart
exactly. DOUBLE ;)
ahhh maybe i didnt explain it right...... the kid isnt posing as a Double.... The kids dont have Doubles..... im just saying its some silly kid messing around on the internet
(http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/1010/62cf12aa5b972930a.jpg) doesn't this pic strike you odd? who's to say if that is this ''look-a-like''. and shades? everytime we discuss doubles with Michael the doubles/possible doubles have shades on.......
-
I also think some pics are of posers or whatever... all the kids have posers, but double? why would a double pose for pics via webcam..If they have doubles for safety then I think they would be used in public...
-
the ones that show him on what looks to be a webcam.... i dont think they are even him.... there probably just some kid posing as blanket on the internet... i dont think that even at that age he is computer smart
exactly. DOUBLE ;)
ahhh maybe i didnt explain it right...... the kid isnt posing as a Double.... The kids dont have Doubles..... im just saying its some silly kid messing around on the internet
(http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/1010/62cf12aa5b972930a.jpg) doesn't this pic strike you odd? who's to say if that is this ''look-a-like''. and shades? everytime we discuss doubles with Michael the doubles/possible doubles have shades on.......
so its a crime to have a pair of sunglasses ??? maybe blanket has friends... he plays with friends and has shades to hide himself..... i just dont buy into the kids having doubles... sorry. next people would be saying that the jackson family are really doubles :lol:
-
Sorry, I don't think the kids have doubles!
What kind of parent would even let his kid be a double for them and be put in danger of a possible kidnapping!! :roll:
Those pics are all cute little Blanket to me!
thats true, and would mike want to put other pp's children at risk - if there is a risk - because there are bodyguards?
but there are some nutty parents out there
-
Why are u so obsessed w/Blanket anyways. Of course the children have doubles for the same reason MJ did. To have some peace when going out or wanting ur privacy. Leave the child alone and stop exploiting him having a double on here...it has nothing to do with anything,
-
The kid in the webcam IS Blanket. There are webcam photos of Paris too.
http://www.prince-paris-blanket-fans.com/
I guess there are even fan clubs for his kids :|
-
The kid in the webcam IS Blanket. There are webcam photos of Paris too.
http://www.prince-paris-blanket-fans.com/
I guess there are even fan clubs for his kids :|
Michael would NEVER allow this!!!!!!! :evil: :twisted:
Think about it.... points away from a hoax.
-
Sorry, I don't think the kids have doubles!
What kind of parent would even let his kid be a double for them and be put in danger of a possible kidnapping!! :roll:
Those pics are all cute little Blanket to me!
You make sense ... ;)
I'm getting so tired of all the posts about doubles.
It's depressing.
(http://i46.tinypic.com/2ebaamu.jpg)
-
The kid in the webcam IS Blanket. There are webcam photos of Paris too.
http://www.prince-paris-blanket-fans.com/
I guess there are even fan clubs for his kids :|
Michael would NEVER allow this!!!!!!! :evil: :twisted:
Think about it.... points away from a hoax.
The webcam photos are leaked photos. Someone posted them WITHOUT the permission of the Jackson family.
Maybe the kids got a laptop to type homework stuff on, and it has a webcam so they took random pics of themselves....and someone got a hold of them and posted them online.
So, it doesn't point away from a hoax....because the Jacksons did not release these photos
-
Maybe Blanket has twin who stayed with mom and Blanket with dad. :?:
I wonder where is the mother of Blanket. Never claims for anything, like does not exist.
-
The kid in the webcam IS Blanket. There are webcam photos of Paris too.
http://www.prince-paris-blanket-fans.com/
I guess there are even fan clubs for his kids :|
Michael would NEVER allow this!!!!!!! :evil: :twisted:
Think about it.... points away from a hoax.
The webcam photos are leaked photos. Someone posted them WITHOUT the permission of the Jackson family.
Maybe the kids got a laptop to type homework stuff on, and it has a webcam so they took random pics of themselves....and someone got a hold of them and posted them online.
So, it doesn't point away from a hoax....because the Jacksons did not release these photos
that makes sense
maybe web cam to daddy? hope so
-
Sorry, I don't think the kids have doubles!
What kind of parent would even let his kid be a double for them and be put in danger of a possible kidnapping!! :roll:
Those pics are all cute little Blanket to me!
thats true, and would mike want to put other pp's children at risk - if there is a risk - because there are bodyguards?
but there are some nutty parents out there
Not really, they would look at it as a opportunity for there child.
-
I don't believe the kids have doubles. That's why Michael would hide their faces to protect them.
-
The kid in the webcam IS Blanket. There are webcam photos of Paris too.
http://www.prince-paris-blanket-fans.com/
I guess there are even fan clubs for his kids :|
Michael would NEVER allow this!!!!!!! :evil: :twisted:
Think about it.... points away from a hoax.
The webcam photos are leaked photos. Someone posted them WITHOUT the permission of the Jackson family.
Maybe the kids got a laptop to type homework stuff on, and it has a webcam so they took random pics of themselves....and someone got a hold of them and posted them online.
So, it doesn't point away from a hoax....because the Jacksons did not release these photos
that makes sense
maybe web cam to daddy? hope so
But this NEVER happened before June 2009... its only happening now. Feels MJ isnt in control. He was always in control of his children. He would seriously not like this at all. Think of how he fiercely protected those children.
-
(http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxdeath.net/forum/images/smilies/smiley357.gif)(http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxdeath.net/forum/images/smilies/smiley357.gif)(http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxdeath.net/forum/images/smilies/smiley357.gif)(http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxdeath.net/forum/images/smilies/smiley357.gif)(http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxdeath.net/forum/images/smilies/smiley357.gif)
x a million
-
im sorry
but this thread is just ridiculous... :roll:
-
It's not ridiculous... it's a FACT. He probably used doubles when they were out shopping with the masks. for protection. I will would sure love to hear Souza's or Mo's opinion on this....
-
It's not ridiculous... it's a FACT. He probably used doubles when they were out shopping with the masks. for protection. I will would sure love to hear Souza's or Mo's opinion on this....
It's a fact? :?
-
It's not ridiculous... it's a FACT. He probably used doubles when they were out shopping with the masks. for protection. I will would sure love to hear Souza's or Mo's opinion on this....
It's a fact? :?
evidence. it's right infront of you. Ok, so if this a ''poser'' who's to say if Michael did use him, for safety during his early years? Or recently. Maybe at The Memorial? We don't know. Because blanket is VERY sensitive to noise and people. so it would have worked for Blanket.....
-
It's not ridiculous... it's a FACT. He probably used doubles when they were out shopping with the masks. for protection. I will would sure love to hear Souza's or Mo's opinion on this....
It's a fact? :?
evidence. it's right infront of you. Ok, so if this a ''poser'' who's to say if Michael did use him, for safety during his early years? Or recently. Maybe at The Memorial? We don't know. Because blanket is VERY sensitive to noise and people. so it would have worked for Blanket.....
It's not a FACT just because you say it is. :roll: :roll: :roll:
-
It's not ridiculous... it's a FACT. He probably used doubles when they were out shopping with the masks. for protection. I will would sure love to hear Souza's or Mo's opinion on this....
It's a fact? :?
evidence. it's right infront of you. Ok, so if this a ''poser'' who's to say if Michael did use him, for safety during his early years? Or recently. Maybe at The Memorial? We don't know. Because blanket is VERY sensitive to noise and people. so it would have worked for Blanket.....
It's not a FACT just because you say it is. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Your right.....................................................
-
:roll: come on so if I look different in various pictures that means that I have a double ok it is your point of view and this is just my opinion but what does it have to be with the hoax
-
:roll: come on so if I look different in various pictures that means that I have a double ok it is your point of view and this is just my opinion but what does it have to be with the hoax
well the use of doubles with Michael has been major in THE HOAX ok? So why not doubles used for his Kids? Ok????????? :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
-
:roll: come on so if I look different in various pictures that means that I have a double ok it is your point of view and this is just my opinion but what does it have to be with the hoax
Also no. but some of these pics of Blanket were taken not to far from eachother ...........
-
It's not ridiculous... it's a FACT. He probably used doubles when they were out shopping with the masks. for protection. I will would sure love to hear Souza's or Mo's opinion on this....
It's a fact? :?
evidence. it's right infront of you. Ok, so if this a ''poser'' who's to say if Michael did use him, for safety during his early years? Or recently. Maybe at The Memorial? We don't know. Because blanket is VERY sensitive to noise and people. so it would have worked for Blanket.....
So MJ USED this child to keep the real Blanket safe? I dont agree with you, sorry. Michael protected his children because he didn't want them photographed and I suppose he also feared someone would kidnap his children. So, knowing how Michael loved children in general, you think he would allow and use an innocent child to keep his son safe? The kid you see wearing sunshades is wearing them for the same purpose his siblings are wearing masks...their dad didnt want leaked photographs of his children everywhere. Oh and this is just my opinion, but I dont think we should be posting photos of children in this site regardless of who they are...doubles or the real deal.
-
It's not ridiculous... it's a FACT. He probably used doubles when they were out shopping with the masks. for protection. I will would sure love to hear Souza's or Mo's opinion on this....
It's a fact? :?
evidence. it's right infront of you. Ok, so if this a ''poser'' who's to say if Michael did use him, for safety during his early years? Or recently. Maybe at The Memorial? We don't know. Because blanket is VERY sensitive to noise and people. so it would have worked for Blanket.....
So MJ USED this child to keep the real Blanket safe? I dont agree with you, sorry. Michael protected his children because he didn't want them photographed and I suppose he also feared someone would kidnap his children. So, knowing how Michael loved children in general, you think he would allow and use an innocent child to keep his son safe? The kid you see wearing sunshades is wearing them for the same purpose his siblings are wearing masks...their dad didnt want leaked photographs of his children everywhere. Oh and this is just my opinion, but I dont think we should be posting photos of children in this site regardless of who they are...doubles or the real deal.
It can be a agreement between the family of the double child. he can be used for various versions. don't be so quick to Judge.......k?
-
Sorry, I don't think the kids have doubles!
What kind of parent would even let his kid be a double for them and be put in danger of a possible kidnapping!! :roll:
Those pics are all cute little Blanket to me!
You make sense ... ;)
I'm getting so tired of all the posts about doubles.
It's depressing.
(http://i46.tinypic.com/2ebaamu.jpg)
i hear you. sorry, i really don't think the kids have doubles. they don't even go out enough or are photographed enough to have a reason for doubles. and to say they would have them for security purposes doesn't make sense to me either, since you are putting the "double children" in danger of crowds too. i doubt michael or anyone in his family would allow child actors or professional child doubles (i don't even know if this exists) to be put in harms way. just my opinion.
-
the family of the double child. he can be used for various versions. don't be so quick to Judge.......k?
Jacksonology, tell me...why did Michael's children wear masks all the time?
-
the family of the double child. he can be used for various versions. don't be so quick to Judge.......k?
Jacksonology, tell me...why did Michael's children wear masks all the time?
probably to PROTECT there Identities. But who knows, those could of been doubles too. while the kids were at home SAFE and SOUND.
-
Guys we have to consider the fact of use of Doubles for the kids. Look at these videos:
[youtube:2ijif1rg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZJ_fA15uh4[/youtube:2ijif1rg]
[youtube:2ijif1rg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq5KobuF0pc[/youtube:2ijif1rg]
[youtube:2ijif1rg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuMajB11Me8[/youtube:2ijif1rg]
do you think Michael would want his kids in these situations? at risk of getting injured and trampled over. and mobbed?
-
the family of the double child. he can be used for various versions. don't be so quick to Judge.......k?
Jacksonology, tell me...why did Michael's children wear masks all the time?
probably to PROTECT there Identities. But who knows, those could of been doubles too. while the kids were at home SAFE and SOUND.
Ok, like you've said...to protect their identities. Every parent wishes safety for their children, just like Michael wanted to protect little Blanket. Do you seriously think a sane parent would have an agreement to let their son serve as a double, when they know the risks this may have, like kidnapping? As much as I love Michael, and as much I would need the money...one thing is sure...I wouldn't risk my child!
Maybe this child is a look-a-like, yes, though he looks like Blanket to me, but if its not Blanket, then its just a kid fooling around over the internet? Someone told him, hey you look like Blanket, and he decided to fool around with people around the internet. There isnt a conspiracy behind everything.
And to your question....do you think Michael wants other kids in those kinds of situations? at risk of getting injured and all that it may take to be a Blanket double?
-
(http://images2.fanpop.com/image/photos/9700000/new-leaked-photos-of-paris-4-paris-jackson-9703760-480-360.jpg)is this another look-a-like?
(http://media.sawfnews.com/images/Entertainment/Paris_Katherine_Jackson_Memorial_7July09.jpg) both ears are different. the real paris' are lower and droopier. the leaked photo her ears are more upper, not as long, and not as many inner ear loops. the ears are WAY Differen't.
-
the family of the double child. he can be used for various versions. don't be so quick to Judge.......k?
Jacksonology, tell me...why did Michael's children wear masks all the time?
probably to PROTECT there Identities. But who knows, those could of been doubles too. while the kids were at home SAFE and SOUND.
Ok, like you've said...to protect their identities. Every parent wishes safety for their children, just like Michael wanted to protect little Blanket. Do you seriously think a sane parent would have an agreement to let their son serve as a double, when they know the risks this may have, like kidnapping? As much as I love Michael, and as much I would need the money...one thing is sure...I wouldn't risk my child!
Maybe this child is a look-a-like, yes, though he looks like Blanket to me, but if its not Blanket, then its just a kid fooling around over the internet? Someone told him, hey you look like Blanket, and he decided to fool around with people around the internet. There isnt a conspiracy behind everything.
And to your question....do you think Michael wants other kids in those kinds of situations? at risk of getting injured and all that it may take to be a Blanket double?
Ever heard of Child Actors? or Maculay Culkin at that fact? His parents had him work all his Childhood. Non-stop. and he had to deal with the Media at a very young age.....
-
the family of the double child. he can be used for various versions. don't be so quick to Judge.......k?
Jacksonology, tell me...why did Michael's children wear masks all the time?
probably to PROTECT there Identities. But who knows, those could of been doubles too. while the kids were at home SAFE and SOUND.
Ok, like you've said...to protect their identities. Every parent wishes safety for their children, just like Michael wanted to protect little Blanket. Do you seriously think a sane parent would have an agreement to let their son serve as a double, when they know the risks this may have, like kidnapping? As much as I love Michael, and as much I would need the money...one thing is sure...I wouldn't risk my child!
Maybe this child is a look-a-like, yes, though he looks like Blanket to me, but if its not Blanket, then its just a kid fooling around over the internet? Someone told him, hey you look like Blanket, and he decided to fool around with people around the internet. There isnt a conspiracy behind everything.
And to your question....do you think Michael wants other kids in those kinds of situations? at risk of getting injured and all that it may take to be a Blanket double?
Ever heard of Child Actors? or Maculay Culkin at that fact? His parents had him work all his Childhood. Non-stop. and he had to deal with the Media at a very young age.....
But he didnt have to serve as a double for anyone. He was making mad money out of his own identity. He wasnt at risk of being kidnapped, mobbed, pulled, or whatever Michael was trying to protect his children from. See the difference?
-
the family of the double child. he can be used for various versions. don't be so quick to Judge.......k?
Jacksonology, tell me...why did Michael's children wear masks all the time?
probably to PROTECT there Identities. But who knows, those could of been doubles too. while the kids were at home SAFE and SOUND.
Ok, like you've said...to protect their identities. Every parent wishes safety for their children, just like Michael wanted to protect little Blanket. Do you seriously think a sane parent would have an agreement to let their son serve as a double, when they know the risks this may have, like kidnapping? As much as I love Michael, and as much I would need the money...one thing is sure...I wouldn't risk my child!
Maybe this child is a look-a-like, yes, though he looks like Blanket to me, but if its not Blanket, then its just a kid fooling around over the internet? Someone told him, hey you look like Blanket, and he decided to fool around with people around the internet. There isnt a conspiracy behind everything.
And to your question....do you think Michael wants other kids in those kinds of situations? at risk of getting injured and all that it may take to be a Blanket double?
Ever heard of Child Actors? or Maculay Culkin at that fact? His parents had him work all his Childhood. Non-stop. and he had to deal with the Media at a very young age.....
But he didnt have to serve as a double for anyone. He was making mad money out of his own identity. He wasnt at risk of being kidnapped, mobbed, pulled, or whatever Michael was trying to protect his children from. See the difference?
true, but he was in a WHOLE different situation then Michael's kids are.............
-
these pics were taken less then a year apart: (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris2.jpg) (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris1-1.jpg) obviously two different ears. real Paris ears are lower, and more Oval, Dynamic. Sort of like a elf (No Pun Intended) the fake one Paris ear is more Circular. The inner ear is more detailed, and dynamic then real paris' ear. unless Paris had ear surgery :roll:
-
Im not comfortable with picking apart the looks of the children. Its just not right.
-
Im not comfortable with picking apart the looks of the children. Its just not right.
Ofcourse your right. and i'm not trying to Bash them. Just broadening my view on the hoax. and looking deeper into it. Michael used doubles IMO. so why not the kids? In certain situations. IM NOT SAYING that we never seen the Real Paris and Blanket. I'm just saying i'm sure that some doubles were used. IMO. i'm not trying to enforce my belief's onto anyone. Michael even said ''people have a voice, there own opinions'' and it's just my humble opinion. i would never or intend to bash these sweet, kind hearted kids, and debunk them as fakes in this post. just looking into POSSIBILITIES Sorry, if i offended anyone...
-
:roll: come on so if I look different in various pictures that means that I have a double ok it is your point of view and this is just my opinion but what does it have to be with the hoax
well the use of doubles with Michael has been major in THE HOAX ok? So why not doubles used for his Kids? Ok????????? :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
I dont know if michael would like that we talk about his kids and less about having doubles :roll: but again it is just my opinion...
-
Im not comfortable with picking apart the looks of the children. Its just not right.
I feel the same...
-
Im not comfortable with picking apart the looks of the children. Its just not right.
Ofcourse your right. and i'm not trying to Bash them. Just broadening my view on the hoax. and looking deeper into it. Michael used doubles IMO. so why not the kids? In certain situations. IM NOT SAYING that we never seen the Real Paris and Blanket. I'm just saying i'm sure that some doubles were used. IMO. i'm not trying to enforce my belief's onto anyone. Michael even said ''people have a voice, there own opinions'' and it's just my humble opinion. i would never or intend to bash these sweet, kind hearted kids, and debunk them as fakes in this post. just looking into POSSIBILITIES Sorry, if i offended anyone...
Of course i understand your intentions of this thread... i know you arent bashing their looks and are investigating the possibility of doubles.
You havent offended me.. this is a free forum where we can discuss anything. Thats what i like about being here. :D
I think recently there have been MANY photos of the children released and leaked onto the net since June 2009. Before then we NEVER saw the children.. i guess that makes me a bit uncomfortable because Michael protected those children so fiercely... and now their images are everywhere
I just dont know what to make of it all... i guess what im trying to say, is that i feel Michaels protection seems to be ebbing away. :?
Makes me worry about those kids.
-
Im not comfortable with picking apart the looks of the children. Its just not right.
Ofcourse your right. and i'm not trying to Bash them. Just broadening my view on the hoax. and looking deeper into it. Michael used doubles IMO. so why not the kids? In certain situations. IM NOT SAYING that we never seen the Real Paris and Blanket. I'm just saying i'm sure that some doubles were used. IMO. i'm not trying to enforce my belief's onto anyone. Michael even said ''people have a voice, there own opinions'' and it's just my humble opinion. i would never or intend to bash these sweet, kind hearted kids, and debunk them as fakes in this post. just looking into POSSIBILITIES Sorry, if i offended anyone...
Of course i understand your intentions of this thread... i know you arent bashing their looks and are investigating the possibility of doubles.
You havent offended me.. this is a free forum where we can discuss anything. Thats what i like about being here. :D
I think recently there have been MANY photos of the children released and leaked onto the net since June 2009. Before then we NEVER saw the children.. i guess that makes me a bit uncomfortable because Michael protected those children so fiercely... and now their images are everywhere
I just dont know what to make of it all... i guess what im trying to say, is that i feel Michaels protection seems to be ebbing away. :?
Makes me worry about those kids.
thank you, i have good intentions with this post. just looking at possibilities. the kids could of had doubles. IN CERTAIN situations. the doubles could of been Child Actors. and Michael could of picked them out himself. If ANYONE is going to be a double/decoy for his children. He has to feel comfortable with them.
-
I can't really imagine Blanket having a double. :(
Sorry homie. it just doesn't add up for me.
It IS possible, but idk.
-
ok.... right...... ummm.....yeah.... the thought of michael having a double isnt that far-fetched and can be taken....but isnt this going a bit too far?? like really the only way that blanket would have a double is is he was a twin... which he isnt....cant we just leave the kids alone and leave them out of this....
I agree. i am here to gain info about the hoax and i can handle opinions and respect opinions. i also can accept all the mj double talk, but some things are getting way to far fetched to the point were some things being dicussed are just plain stupid. Can we just stick to the main topics and leave the children out of this. Why would he need a double at this age. plz.
-
I can't comment Mo will ban me :P
-
Well, in some of those pictures he was younger. When kids are little their faces tend to be rounder, their cheeks are bigger, etc. Plus, he's growing & he's gotten a bit skinnier, causing his face to change a little, his features (chin, jawline, cheekbones, etc.) are becoming more pronounced. It's normal. The thing that never changes in those pictures are the eyes. :shock: It's in the EYES. Those are MJ's eyes, they are unmistakable.[/quote how younger can he be!? he's under 10 lmao unless he was 6 or 5 in one of these pics :roll:
My little cousin looks different now than he did last year. He is 8. His jawline is getting more pronounced, as well as his cheekbones, chin, etc. Just as I said Blanket's are. He's also taller & getting more slender. It happens. Kids grow up & change too, that's just common knowledge. I don't see why that's hard to believe. Also, as far as Blanket being on the computer, I have little cousins younger than 8, 6 & 7 who know how to use the computer & it could have been someone else's computer/webcam, they set it up for him & showed him how to take a picture. Are you saying he's too stupid to figure out how to take a picture of himself? :roll: Has anyone seen the commercial with the little 5 year old girl who takeds pictures & uploads them on the computer & makes slideshows. Then she says "my name is ____ & I'm a PC". If she can be taught what to do & figure it out, why wouldn't Blanket be able to? He's a kid but he's not a baby. Also, Paris, Prince & Blanket are growing up. They can't be sheltered forever. They are now around their cousins, having fun being regular kids. If they want to mess around on the webcam like their cousins do & take pictures, they can. The person at fault is whoever is leaking these pictures, not the kids. I don't think MJ would put someone else's kids in danger either. He has body guards to protect himself & his kids. Besides he didn't show them to the world for the longest time to prevent that from happening. If MJ hoaxed his death, I believe he did it because he had to, he trusts his mom to take care of them & he trusts them around their cousins. It's very important for them to have their cousins who are their age around them. Like I said they are growing up. So what? IMO they don't have doubles, the pictures you posted look like the same kids to me. :roll:
-
Im not comfortable with picking apart the looks of the children. Its just not right.
+1
-
Correct me if i'm wrong, you say that MJ used doubles of his kids to protect the real ones from dangerous situations, so please tell me, why couldn't he goes alone? anyway the real ones are at home, so wouldn't it be easier to go without children?
-
i didnt read the post but i can assure you this IS BLANKET!
stop saying they have dobles...
ias true that there are posers but this is BLANKET.
the screencap is from a video of him.
-
ok this is F***K disturbing...
the pics with paris are real.they were leaked on the internet by someone that heaked grace's email.
first is a big difference between a poser and the real paris.
i can show you posers if you want to.
i can even make a topic with the pics of the kids that are leaked to see that the pics are real.
second in that pic with paris and the cat the other girl is spencer malnik.you can google "spencer malnik" and you see that is the same girl from the pic.
and 3rd the pics with blanket "screaming" are real.they are like i said screencaps from a video that he made at the webcam.
the video is in the internet on a private photobucket account of one of his counsins(i think is randy Jr).
one day photobucket had a service problem and allowed all the users to have acces at the private albums.
a girl had the luck to enter in randy's photobucket album and took the video (well are 2 videos).
she was about to realise them on the internet,but she thought that is not nice to do that and stoped.
she insted gave us some screencaps and told us the story about the "scream" pic. the story is that blanket is a big fan of "star war" and in some of the part one of the caracters are yelling "liarrrrr" .he screamed"liaaarrr" too.lol
thats the story.
so stop being paranoid about dobles of the kids.
and btw the videos with mj and so called kids doble...is not true.they are the kids.mike would never go out without the kids.
so like i said IS THE REAL BLANKET.
and THE REAL PARIS .
ans THE REAL PRINCE.
and if you want evidence of what i said tell me and i'll post some pics.
....
-
Imo it's ridiculous, in a matter of time everyone surrounding MJ has a double.
-
I don't believe the idea that MJ would use doubles for his kids ..I don't even think there's a possibility for that ..I mean he had doubles only b/c they MADE themselves look like MJ by going in surgery... How could he find kids that looked like them so much ..And whats the idea of going shopping and trips with doubles instead of his REAL children :? Despite the fact that it is pretty risky and dangerous to do that ....Thats why MJ showed his kids b4 the hoax so people and the media won't make rumors saying that those aren't his children or they're "doubles" ..I think this is pretty similar to what your saying or what you believe ..........JMO
-
I don't believe the idea that MJ would use doubles for his kids ..I don't even think there's a possibility for that ..I mean he had doubles only b/c they MADE themselves look like MJ by going in surgery... How could he find kids that looked like them so much ..And whats the idea of going shopping and trips with doubles instead of his REAL children :? Despite the fact that it is pretty risky and dangerous to do that ....Thats why MJ showed his kids b4 the hoax so people and the media won't make rumors saying that those aren't his children or they're "doubles" ..I think this is pretty similar to what your saying or what you believe ..........JMO
I'm not denying prince paris or blanket aren't his children.... i'm just possibly pointing out the use of doubles in there lifes.....
-
Guys, I didn't mean to start this topic to get bashed, or hated. I know this is a sensitive topic to some memembers, because out of all people the kids are suffering from the absense of there father. I just thought this topic needed to be made and discussed. About doubles used POSSIBLYin there early years, for chaotic enviorments, noise, and dangers. THAT'S ALL. i'm not claiming Prince Paris and Blanket aren't his children. I'm not saying they are hired child actors
-
Correct me if i'm wrong, you say that MJ used doubles of his kids to protect the real ones from dangerous situations, so please tell me, why couldn't he goes alone? anyway the real ones are at home, so wouldn't it be easier to go without children?
Exactly, I thought te same thing.
It simply doesn't make any sense at all to use doubles for the children.
(http://i46.tinypic.com/2ebaamu.jpg)
-
These doubles huh... Do they have a life for their own?
-
There is a possibility that Michael used doubles from time to time to destract the media's attention and to be left alone but kids....i dont think so. Blanket in all pictures-just from different angles,just my opinion ;)
-
Like Mo and I posted back on good ol' MJHD, everything and everyone in this hoax seems to be double:
Another theory within the Movie Theory: The Double Theory
Lots and lots in this hoax is double!
O2
2 MJ’s at O2 press conference in London (stage-mike and curtain-mike)
Dr. Tohme Tohme
2 MJ’s at Ed Hardy
2 video’s of the coroner’s van
2 different video’s from helicopters transporting the body to the coroner
2 Death Certificates
2 passports from MJ leaked
2 different middle names: Joe and Joseph
2 alledged son’s (Omer Bhatti and Jett Jackson)
2 ‘wives’ (Claire Cruise and Billie Jean Jackson)
2 Memorials (private and public)
Mike’s posessions removed out of 2 houses
2 tribute’s (Jermaine & Frank Dileo)
2 Last Will’s (1997 & 2002)
Murray video was place twice at Youtube (was taken off once ant put back)
Mike signed the AEG contract twice
Rumor has it that Mike has 2 ss#
2 autopsies
2 different MJ hairstyles (straight and curly)
2 strange guys showing up in front of the camera at the livestream of TMZ (PT Barnum circusguy and Afro-head-Elvis)
2 Harvey’s (Harvey Levin – TMZ & Craig Harvey – Coroner’s Office)
2 tourist busses at Carolwood Drive making footage of Ambulance
2 names for fatal medicin (Promofol/Diprivan)
2 trucks to empty Carolwood Drive
2 guardians appointed by Mike in his will (Katherine and Diana Ross)
2 former business partners appointed executers of the estate
2 versions of 911-call (one with and one without address mentioned)
Michael’s 2 tigers in the news due to the California fires
2 raids at Carolwood Drive
Rehearsal footage from 2 days (performance + chewing gum guy)
2 opinions about Mike’s Health/General appearance)
2 different ways to preserve the body (embalming and deep freeze)
2 locations for public memorial (Staples and Nokia)
2 UPS guys during the raids
2 nurses involved (Cherilyn Lee and Debbie Rowe)
2 doctors interrogated (Arnie Klein and Conrad Murray)
2 female employees of Murray picking up boxes at storage morning of MJ’s ‘Death’ (lalagirls)
2 ‘Deathbeds’ (MJ bed and Doc’s bed)
2 memorial programs (one for invited, one for fans)
Burial postponed twice
2 sisters to take care of the kids (Janet and Rebbie)
2 familymembers talking about foul play (LaToya and Joe)
2 raids on pharmacies (Vegas and LA)
2 persons calling cops for protection (Arnold Klein & Debbie Rowe)
2 stories concerning time of death (one death at arrival EMT’s, other death at hospital)
This Is It 2 weeks in theaters
2 final resting places (Grand Mausoleum and Freedom Mausoluem)
Brother carry casket twice (memorial and burial)
2 books to be released about MJ (Moonwalker and ‘Coffeetable Book’)
2 Singers announced to perfom on MJ’s funeral (Gladys Knight and Aretha Franklin)
2 memorial dates (it was delayed)
2 Hatmans at memorial
2 This is It teaser trailers
Dave Dave at Larry King Live
What if the This Is It movie is truly rehearsal footage, and Mike releases a second one, explaining the hoax? So the last double:
2 movies?
-
I think we should just leave the kids alone. I know from my own experience of being a parent...you can say anything you like about me, but touch my kids and I turn into a lioness. I don't believe MJ would feel any less protective.
-
I'm not Michael Jackson, but if I were super famous and had kids there is no way in hell I would want people even postin their pictures on some website where people would be "investigating" or nitpicking them as if they aren't who they are. EVEN IF I WEREN'T FAMOUS I wouldn't want this. At some point there's gotta be a line drawn...and this, to me, is crossing it BIG TIME.
-
these pics were taken less then a year apart: (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris2.jpg) (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris1-1.jpg) obviously two different ears. real Paris ears are lower, and more Oval, Dynamic. Sort of like a elf (No Pun Intended) the fake one Paris ear is more Circular. The inner ear is more detailed, and dynamic then real paris' ear. unless Paris had ear surgery :roll:
I don't think it has to be that way. The first picture is taken from the side and the other from above,
which ofcourse makes the ear look different in the second pic.
-
I also want a double... I have to go to school tomorrow, so I can go to vaccation today!
-
I'm not Michael Jackson, but if I were super famous and had kids there is no way in hell I would want people even postin their pictures on some website where people would be "investigating" or nitpicking them as if they aren't who they are. EVEN IF I WEREN'T FAMOUS I wouldn't want this. At some point there's gotta be a line drawn...and this, to me, is crossing it BIG TIME.
I agree, it feels like it's crossing a very big line you never should cross, and some people in here
are sometimes acting as disrespectful as the media is, when it comes to the children.
-
Sorry, I don't think the kids have doubles!
What kind of parent would even let his kid be a double for them and be put in danger of a possible kidnapping!! :roll:
Those pics are all cute little Blanket to me!
Agree. No double Blanket at all
Come on so all the Jackson's have doubles now do they...Oh #2 Joe, Katherine, Jermaine, Janet etc etc come out come out wherever you are!!!
-
I don't think Blanket has an impersonator, he just looks different in some photo's. And in two of the photo's he has what appears to be an identical mole or marking on the side of his mouth (in the photo it would be on the left side). But the kid you said looks Mexican, yeah I agree, that ain't Blanket (Where'd you get that photo?). Be careful of some of these sites that you get photo's from cause sometimes they have lookalikes and not the real people. I've seen a paparazzi video and a photo of a woman they mistakenly indentified as Grace Rwaramba when it wasn't even her, but that doesn't mean she has a double. I appreciate you for sharing your finding's though. L.O.V.E
-
Sorry, I don't think the kids have doubles!
What kind of parent would even let his kid be a double for them and be put in danger of a possible kidnapping!! :roll:
Those pics are all cute little Blanket to me!
Agree. No double Blanket at all
Come on so all the Jackson's have doubles now do they...Oh #2 Joe, Katherine, Jermaine, Janet etc etc come out come out wherever you are!!!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: (offcourse you're right ... ;) )
(http://i46.tinypic.com/2ebaamu.jpg)
-
I feel the children should be left alone it feels awkward to me.
-
I can't believe the things I read in this thread. To me the doubles theory is ridiculous enough but I can't believe you're picking on the children now. They're just children!
If you really claim the children have their own doubles; who's children are those doubles? Do you really think someone would let their children be used as doubles for someone else's kids and Michael would aprove of that?!
Face the reality: the doubles theory is impossible for so many reasons.
-
I can't believe the things I read in this thread. To me the doubles theory is ridiculous enough but I can't believe you're picking on the children now. They're just children!
If you really claim the children have their own doubles; who's children are those doubles? Do you really think someone would let their children be used as doubles for someone else's kids and Michael would aprove of that?!
Face the reality: the doubles theory is impossible for so many reasons.
You're right ... ;)
(http://i46.tinypic.com/2ebaamu.jpg)
-
I can't believe the things I read in this thread. To me the doubles theory is ridiculous enough but I can't believe you're picking on the children now. They're just children!
If you really claim the children have their own doubles; who's children are those doubles? Do you really think someone would let their children be used as doubles for someone else's kids and Michael would aprove of that?!
Face the reality: the doubles theory is impossible for so many reasons.
I told myself I would stop reading doubles' threads because it gets my blood pressure up. ;) Wouldn't it be great if TS would debunk all this on a new update...maybe if we asked nicely...
-
I don't believe in doubles for the kids because i barely look at doubles for Michael!!!
Alright i respect your point of view but i just don't see any difference in the kids :|
Soo at that and about those situations about being trampled and all that Michael said in that Bahsir Documentary that he'd rather them be with him and get hurt than with someone else and they get hurt. So i just think that even tho they were his kids he thought they need to get out and live to because what about when they get older they are gonna have to leave the house sometime :D So at that i don't think doubles would be for the kids and at times when he goes out with his kids that it's not a double for him ;) Hope i made since with you guys :)
-
Dancing_Machine wrote:I can't believe the things I read in this thread. To me the doubles theory is ridiculous enough but I can't believe you're picking on the children now. They're just children!
If you really claim the children have their own doubles; who's children are those doubles? Do you really think someone would let their children be used as doubles for someone else's kids and Michael would aprove of that?!
Face the reality: the doubles theory is impossible for so many reasons.
ABSOLUTELY AGREE WITH U.
-
Without reading this thread I say: STOP DIGGING IN KIDS LIFE!!! Stop uploading their pictures! Leave them alone! Have little more respect to them and their father!
-
So if the kids MJ is with on outings are the doubles, then he leaves his real kids locked up in the house 24/7?! That's ridiculous & unhealthy. Sorry but it is. He'd rather spend time doing things & going places with SOMEONE ELSE'S kids? I don't think so. He took his kids out with him sometimes, so that they can get out of the house & do something fun. I don't believe he'd use doubles for his kids. & I agree with everyone who said picking on the kids & even discussing this stuff in the first place is crossing a line. Leave them alone. Next topic. :roll:
-
I cant believe what Im reading..
Seriously?
MJ revelaed his kids to us before his death for a REASON....do you really think they have doubles? I think this is reaching a little tiny bit.
-
So, let me see if I get this right. The children would have doubles for their protection, but we, in our infinite wisdom think that its okay to speculate, ad nauseum, about the subject because unsavory characters don't roam these sites. Right. How about respecting MJ and his kids. Do we need to join the exploitation train? I think we are better that this. These are my thoughts. No debate necessary. Peace and harmony. One Love.
-
I can't believe the things I read in this thread. To me the doubles theory is ridiculous enough but I can't believe you're picking on the children now. They're just children!
If you really claim the children have their own doubles; who's children are those doubles? Do you really think someone would let their children be used as doubles for someone else's kids and Michael would aprove of that?!
Face the reality: the doubles theory is impossible for so many reasons.
Name a few please. If you judge us and say we are ridiculous, we would like to know WHY.
-
I can't believe the things I read in this thread. To me the doubles theory is ridiculous enough but I can't believe you're picking on the children now. They're just children!
If you really claim the children have their own doubles; who's children are those doubles? Do you really think someone would let their children be used as doubles for someone else's kids and Michael would aprove of that?!
Face the reality: the doubles theory is impossible for so many reasons.
Name a few please. If you judge us and say we are ridiculous, we would like to know WHY.
THANK YOU, Souza. Agreed.
And...If I've learned anything these past 10 months, I've learned that nothing is impossible.
-
I can't believe the things I read in this thread. To me the doubles theory is ridiculous enough but I can't believe you're picking on the children now. They're just children!
If you really claim the children have their own doubles; who's children are those doubles? Do you really think someone would let their children be used as doubles for someone else's kids and Michael would aprove of that?!
Face the reality: the doubles theory is impossible for so many reasons.
Name a few please. If you judge us and say we are ridiculous, we would like to know WHY.
thank you Souza! atleast someone agrees with me.... and IMO the kids used doubles. and i'm not changing my mind about that.....
-
(http://img.ibtimes.com/www/data/articles/full/2009/07/07/365_michael-jacksons-kids-attend-memorial.jpg)(http://blogs.bet.com/entertainment/spotlight/bet-blog/assets/2009/11/prince-michael.jpg)um where's the chin? not the same kid. REAL prince at the memorial, his chin is distinct and has a shape. the DOUBLE prince's chin has no shape whatsoever it's not as dynamic, and sharp. and his face is rounder and fuller then Prince at the memorial. Prince's facial features are like his father's. Dynamic. Not Chubby. Also the prince at the memorial has the vitiligo bloches on his neck if you look close enough. the DOUBLE with the hoodie does not.
-
Well I don't know about that one, looks the same to me. What difference do you see?
-
Well I don't know about that one, looks the same to me. What difference do you see?
Prince has the vitiligo bloches.
-
Well I don't know about that one, looks the same to me. What difference do you see?
Prince has the vitiligo bloches.
this kid doesn't.
-
these pics were taken less then a year apart: (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris2.jpg) (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris1-1.jpg) obviously two different ears. real Paris ears are lower, and more Oval, Dynamic. Sort of like a elf (No Pun Intended) the fake one Paris ear is more Circular. The inner ear is more detailed, and dynamic then real paris' ear. unless Paris had ear surgery :roll:
I don't think it has to be that way. The first picture is taken from the side and the other from above,
which ofcourse makes the ear look different in the second pic.
but should the ears be different? no matter what angle a picture is taken, the ear stays the same....
-
Well I don't know about that one, looks the same to me. What difference do you see?
Prince has the vitiligo bloches.
I am not sure about Prince and the vitiligo. It looks like lights from the glass of a watch for instance. He is pretty young to develop vitiligo already...
-
these pics were taken less then a year apart: (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris2.jpg) (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris1-1.jpg) obviously two different ears. real Paris ears are lower, and more Oval, Dynamic. Sort of like a elf (No Pun Intended) the fake one Paris ear is more Circular. The inner ear is more detailed, and dynamic then real paris' ear. unless Paris had ear surgery :roll:
I don't think it has to be that way. The first picture is taken from the side and the other from above,
which ofcourse makes the ear look different in the second pic.
but should the ears be different? no matter what angle a picture is taken, the ear stays the same....
You would think so, but angles can change very much!
-
these pics were taken less then a year apart: (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris2.jpg) (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris1-1.jpg) obviously two different ears. real Paris ears are lower, and more Oval, Dynamic. Sort of like a elf (No Pun Intended) the fake one Paris ear is more Circular. The inner ear is more detailed, and dynamic then real paris' ear. unless Paris had ear surgery :roll:
I don't think it has to be that way. The first picture is taken from the side and the other from above,
which ofcourse makes the ear look different in the second pic.
but should the ears be different? no matter what angle a picture is taken, the ear stays the same....
You would think so, but angles can change very much!
no offense ladyandbird and no disrespect but i have a better argument then you do...
-
Jacksonology , I understand what he says, can be a matter of safety, .. PEACE :mrgreen:
-
Jacksonology , I understand what he says, can be a matter of safety, .. PEACE :mrgreen:
yes. and the people that say ''oh but why would Michael put other kids in danger'' have you heard of Child Actors? plus they had security. so it would of been safe for the Doubles. but IMHO, i don't think Michael didn't want to expose his kids to those type of enviorments. paparazzi chasing him, people screaming ontop of eachother, lights flashing EVERYWHERE. Mobbing s. especially in at a young age. so Doubles would of worked for SOME public appearances.
-
Jacksonology , I understand what he says, can be a matter of safety, .. PEACE :mrgreen:
yes. and the people that say ''oh but why would Michael put other kids in danger'' have you heard of Child Actors? plus they had security. so it would of been safe for the Doubles. but IMHO, i don't think Michael didn't want to expose his kids to those type of enviorments. paparazzi chasing him, people screaming ontop of eachother, lights flashing EVERYWHERE. Mobbing s. especially in at a young age. so Doubles would of worked for SOME public appearances.
I'm gonna ask again: why couldn't he go alone? there is no need to go with kids if anyway the real ones are at home.
-
I think those children were told at a very early age WHO their dad is and what he does. They are very aware of it in his home vids. They had experienced alot of paps and people mobbing MJ. He only veiled them because he didnt want people to see their faces for fear of kidnapping etc.
and if it was safe for the DOUBLES, then why wouldnt it be safe for his real kids?
Again, I dont think the kids had doubles. As far as MJ goes,, Im still on the fence about it, but I do not think those kids had doubles.
-
Loveneverfeltsogood, Well, Shortly Before The "death" of Michae all saw pictures of Children, Then her father "dies", They Have to go to the Memorial and Then the funeral. As his father "not" They make a normal life, many times we Have Heard La Toya and Other Family Members Saying That the Children make a normal life like Any Other historical age boy, "PLEASE DO NOT WANT TO misunderstand me, I DO NOT WANT TO SAY THAT MICHAEL NOT have a normal life, "contrary to BELIEVE THAT GAVE THEIR CHILDREN MICHAEL A FOSTER Envy, full of courage. PEACE ;)
-
are theories, also if you did I will not question, are their children's life .. we must remember what he lived. :geek:
-
new comparison: (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/realparis.jpg) (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris2.jpg) I think we can agree that these ears are different....
-
new comparison: (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/realparis.jpg) (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris2.jpg) I think we can agree that these ears are different....
I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.
-
new comparison: (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/realparis.jpg) (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris2.jpg) I think we can agree that these ears are different....
I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.
one is taller then the other. and the end of the ears are different. one is pointier and curvier. one is just round.
-
I can't believe the things I read in this thread. To me the doubles theory is ridiculous enough but I can't believe you're picking on the children now. They're just children!
If you really claim the children have their own doubles; who's children are those doubles? Do you really think someone would let their children be used as doubles for someone else's kids and Michael would aprove of that?!
Face the reality: the doubles theory is impossible for so many reasons.
Name a few please. If you judge us and say we are ridiculous, we would like to know WHY.
I never said anyone is ridiculous, I said the theory is.
You can find one of the reasons in my previous post and I already gave enough reasons in other double threads. I'm not going to repeat myself.
-
new comparison: (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/realparis.jpg) (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris2.jpg) I think we can agree that these ears are different....
I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.
I can't see it either.
-
new comparison: (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/realparis.jpg) (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris2.jpg) I think we can agree that these ears are different....
I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.
I can't see it either.
:roll: :roll: ONE IS LONGER, ONE IS SHORTER. ONE IS POINTER AT THE END AND THE SHAPE OF THE EAR IS DYNAMIC. ONE IS JUST ROUND AND THE TIP ISN'T POINTY.
-
new comparison: (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/realparis.jpg) (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris2.jpg) I think we can agree that these ears are different....
I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.
I can't see it either.
:roll: :roll: ONE IS LONGER, ONE IS SHORTER. ONE IS POINTER AT THE END AND THE SHAPE OF THE EAR IS DYNAMIC. ONE IS JUST ROUND AND THE TIP ISN'T POINTY.
You don't have to use caps, it looks like you're shouting.
The left ear looks blurry to me, so I can't see the difference. I don't think a blurry picture proofs anything, but that's my opinion.
-
tried my best to trace. but you should be able to see the differences.
-
tried my best to trace. but you should be able to see the differences.
`
I see... uhmm?
-
tried my best to trace. but you should be able to see the differences.
`
I see... uhmm?
one is longer. and the shapes are different.
-
Well I don't know about that one, looks the same to me. What difference do you see?
Prince has the vitiligo bloches.
I am not sure about Prince and the vitiligo. It looks like lights from the glass of a watch for instance. He is pretty young to develop vitiligo already...
well, the REAL prince has ''spots'' on his neck. the FAKE prince doesn't...............................................................
-
Sorry Jacksonology (I almost spelled my own own name there!!), but I still cant see it..
-
Jacksonology wrote:
tried my best to trace. but you should be able to see the differences.
Yes, I think that if
-
Jacksonology wrote:
tried my best to trace. but you should be able to see the differences.
Yes, I think that if
????
-
Jacksonology wrote:
tried my best to trace. but you should be able to see the differences.
Yes, I think that if
????
yea.....?????
Jacksonology...are you a guy or girl? Just curious.
-
I am not sure about Prince and the vitiligo. It looks like lights from the glass of a watch for instance. He is pretty young to develop vitiligo already...
Actually Souza, there is no set age to develop Vitiligo. It doesn't always come out when you're an adult (in MJ's case).
Have you ever heard about Darcel De Vlugt?
TAKEN FROM http://www.vitiligos.com/people-with-vitiligo/famous-people/
"Darcel De Vlugt, from Islington, North London, was born to black parents from Trinidad but she turned white because of Vitiligo (Vitiligo causes the immune system to attack the pigment cells). The first signs of vitiligo appeared when Darcel was only of five years. Her parents, Peter and Charmaine, say the girl had some white spots on the forehead and the forearm.
This disease started progression and in just two years she had developed vitiligo on her arms and legs too. Progression of vitiligo continued and turned 80 percent of her body white and by the time she turned seventeen her skin had completely turned white.
Doctors say that they haven’t seen this type of case before in which a person completely turns white because of vitiligo.
The teenage years were the hardest because that was when my skin was really patchy. I would get called all kinds of things, such as spotty or dalmatian.
I missed out on so many normal social things that teenagers do because I was so self-conscious. It is very hard looking like a white girl when I was born black. I had identity crises all the time."
-
Jacksonology, What happened, did not understand me?, Said if it could be ....
-
thecheetoman2004, You know I always see a person (a woman) with this type of vitiligo, where I work, she has (are the parts of your body that are to be seen) the arms, face and chest full of white produto the disease.
-
Eyebrows don't lie. LMAO :lol:
-
Eyebrows don't lie. LMAO :lol:
???
-
I understand that this whole "Doubles Theory" is always a very controversial topic. There are a lot of people that believe in it and, of course, there are a lot of people that do not believe in it. I personally do not. No, it is not because I'm a close minded person. No, it's not because I have a certain image of MJ and this is emotional hard to believe. And no, it's not because I'm ignorant. (I still don't see how me not agreeing with a certain thing makes me ignorant... but whatever.) I have seen and read what people think about this whole thing that do agree with the theory. I honestly understand what you are all trying to say. Sure, it's possible...but that doesn't mean that it's true. Anything is possible. I do believe that.
I think that everyone needs to realize that everyone will have their own opinions. (Believe it or not, some of us would like to think for ourselves and come up with our own conclusions.) Posts about doubles are doomed from the start. No one knows for a fact about any of this! Almost everything about doubles is assumptions. None are facts. No one here can really prove that MJ or (I hate to even write this) his kids had doubles. This only brings up arguments every single time.....has no one really picked up on this trend other than me?
Ya know what? IF MJ has doubles and so do his children...then so be it. How the hell is it our business either way? I personally do not see what the kids possibility of having doubles has to do with the hoax, and if i'm mistaken I thought this was Michael Jackson Hoax Forum...
-
Guys i meant that each kid has a look-a-like- what i meant to say is who is to say if they were Used or contacted for Use. Child Actors. Not that doubles were used. JustPOSSIBLITIES [/color][/b]
-
thecheetoman2004, You know I always see a person (a woman) with this type of vitiligo, where I work, she has (are the parts of your body that are to be seen) the arms, face and chest full of white produto the disease.
I've seen someone before that has the disease (but not the "full-white" one). The person had the version where your skin is all splotchy. People tended to veer away from the person, but I just wanted to reach out and hug them.
-
these pics were taken less then a year apart: (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris2.jpg) (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris1-1.jpg) obviously two different ears. real Paris ears are lower, and more Oval, Dynamic. Sort of like a elf (No Pun Intended) the fake one Paris ear is more Circular. The inner ear is more detailed, and dynamic then real paris' ear. unless Paris had ear surgery :roll:
I don't think it has to be that way. The first picture is taken from the side and the other from above,
which ofcourse makes the ear look different in the second pic.
but should the ears be different? no matter what angle a picture is taken, the ear stays the same....
You would think so, but angles can change very much!
no offense ladyandbird and no disrespect but i have a better argument then you do...
Yes, ofcourse that's your opinion, otherwise you wouldn't start a topic about it,
if you didn't think that you were right about it. But I don't think you are, so we will
just have to agree that we disagree.
-
Eyebrows don't lie. LMAO :lol:
???
In some pictures his eyebrows are kind of straight and some they are kind of arched. Also the earlobes are different in some pics. Yes children grow and change but some things don't.
-
Eyebrows don't lie. LMAO :lol:
???
In some pictures his eyebrows are kind of straight and some they are kind of arched. Also the earlobes are different in some pics. Yes children grow and change but some things don't.
Yes. and who is to say these ''look-a-likes'' weren't used for Doubles.
-
My sister-in-law has vitiligo and her 3 children were born with it (to a lesser extent).
-
double? blanket is 7. this kid looks like 10 or 11. the pic doesn't look to good to compare but, his face looks longer then the real blanket. the nose is longer then the real blanket. and blanket has thicker eyebrows. this is the real blanket. compare the attachment photo and the head and face in this photo.: (http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/blanketc.jpg) Also, these photos are taken a week apart.
-
these pic comparisons are for those who didn't read the whole thread:(http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/5482/alkhdlfhd.jpg)(http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/1050/lshdfljsdhfo.jpg)(http://media.sawfnews.com/images/Entertainment/Paris_Katherine_Jackson_Memorial_7July09.jpg)(http://images2.fanpop.com/image/photos/9700000/new-leaked-photos-of-paris-4-paris-jackson-9703760-480-360.jpg)(http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris1-1.jpg)(http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac249/mjdeathhoax/paris2.jpg)(http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/download/file.php?id=5800)(http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/download/file.php?id=5799)if you look closely at all these pics you will see differences.
-
Eyebrows don't lie. LMAO :lol:
???
In some pictures his eyebrows are kind of straight and some they are kind of arched. Also the earlobes are different in some pics. Yes children grow and change but some things don't.
Yes. and who is to say these ''look-a-likes'' weren't used for Doubles.
Oh, I'm not disagreeing with you.
-
Eyebrows don't lie. LMAO :lol:
???
In some pictures his eyebrows are kind of straight and some they are kind of arched. Also the earlobes are different in some pics. Yes children grow and change but some things don't.
Yes. and who is to say these ''look-a-likes'' weren't used for Doubles.
Oh, I'm not disagreeing with you.
i know, atleast someone agrees with me :D