Topics

1

Other Albums / beLIEve album...?

« on: January 04, 2011, 04:55:28 PM »

I found this album, called "beLIEve" on a Taringa! site (I've tried to find the site again, but unfortunately my browser doesn't keep history), it's interesting because I've heard a couple of the tracks but the rest I've never heard of before...

I just thought it was interesting that someone was passing off an album with that name that seems to be synonymous with hoax theorists.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


Honestly, it's better than "Michael", because its obvious that all the tracks are authentic MJ vocals.

2

General Hoax Talk / The Hoax in general.

« on: November 09, 2010, 01:20:43 AM »

I was hoping you all would be able to help me out.

I've been searching all through this forum, and I haven't been able to find really anything about the hoax itself other than things that seem to be tied to other stuff that I can't find. I would be very interested to learn about the hoax itself, like individual pieces of the puzzle, why everyone here seems to be convinced 100% without a shadow of a doubt about him having faked his death, etc.

I really don't want to sound like I'm lazy and want others to do the work for me, all I'd like to know is where to begin. I've been looking into this for months now, but I feel like there's a huge gap in what I know. Maybe anyone in the know might be able to not just help me but others who are new here who might be confused.

I've watched a few videos on YouTube, but I'm not sure how reliable they are... a lot of them seem to be grasps at straws and looking into things a bit too deeply and obsessively, with wishful thinking. You all seem very sincere in your insistence that he's alive and that there's a hoax, so I wouldn't accuse you guys of that.

Thanks in advance.

~Makazradon

3

Michael's features, habits & disguises / The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

« on: October 25, 2010, 09:45:47 PM »

Hi, I've been lurking around here for some months now, and finally decided to register.

I understand that this has been discussed to some degree, but I thought it might be worth going into further.

I've put together a collage of various incarnations of the man, and it is very intriguing to say the least.



I believe A, D and H to be him, no doubt about it. A is the earliest photo, and you can see the earliest signs of his Vitiligo. D and H are most similar to A, and appear to be either just directly older versions of him, or he's wearing makeup to cover blotches of dark pigmentation (to even out his light skin). What's interesting here is that it seems to be very rare to see this particular version of him. In my view, is that ADH Mike is the only one that makes me go "Yes, that's him, 100%." I guess I've never really though about it, but when I see the others, I don't really question it, but I think he looks odd in the others. Apart from ADH Mike, all of the others have that look of high strangeness (B, C and E, specifically) that his critics seem to love to jump on, which makes people think he looks like he's had tons of surgery. :roll:

It's very peculiar, aside from his nose, ADH Mike doesn't look like he's had any work done whatsoever.

B and G seem like total fakes.

Another point of interest is, in this collage (call it lighting, or something else if you'd like), it seems as though his skin tone is completely different between all of them... my theory is that his impersonators, for obvious reasons would be Caucasian instead of African-American as he is. Because of this, they would not have pale-white "void of pigment" skin. I am convinced that G, for example, is Caucasian. His skin is way too dark to be Vitiligo. Have you ever seen someone lose their pigmentation and have their skin turn a yellowish tint? Forgetting the fact that this contradicts what we've seen his skin like so many times previous.

What I was wondering was... has MJ ever been seen in public without makeup in his adulthood? Perhaps F is the answer... hmm.

Then there's E, I and J which... could be him, I guess?

This is a very fascinating and confusing subject indeed, but I am more than convinced that there's at least three different people in the collage.