0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI dont know if this was discussed but Arnold Klein states that he was out of the country for the month of May therefore Michael did not see him 3 times a week during that period. I remember seeing that somewhere too. But the pictures clearly show a "Michael" coming and going to that office. I guess we could interpret that two ways:1) Klein is indirectly telling us that was not Michael 2) Michael was seeing another doctor there while Klein was gone.(there are other specialists in the office)---> in which case you'd have to wonder what was he going in for (which also would imply something more cosmetically complex than Kleins area of expertise).Michael Amir does mention the visit in his testimony, but he doesn't specify how long "Michael" was in the office. They might have given some clues as to what type of procedure was done. Although coming out "groggy" would imply something complex enough to be put under heavy anesthesia not just a local. Another weird thing just occured to me....in the trial the lawyers keep asking over and over if dentist use propofol. What would be the purpose in establishing that? Are they hinting at dental records? "Michael's" mouth was covered for alot of those visits (his standard black face mask), but when you pair that with the trial questions, it does make you wonder if they aren't getting at something else by bringing it up.Then you think back to Kleins bizarre "peeing in the cup" stories and then the constant mention of urine collection and testing in the trial....yet no one will ask the question thats hanging in the air..."What about Michael's DNA" Clearly dental records or urine sampling would establish that.....then again, maybe they aren't after Klein....maybe someone else in that office. :?
I dont know if this was discussed but Arnold Klein states that he was out of the country for the month of May therefore Michael did not see him 3 times a week during that period.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI dont know if this was discussed but Arnold Klein states that he was out of the country for the month of May therefore Michael did not see him 3 times a week during that period.I saw pics of MJ supposedly leaving Kleins office wearing a mask but having a hairy chest. Other pics of MJ show him having no hairs on his chest. Unless someone can testify MJ shaved his chest, the I am inclined to believe it wasn't actually MJ. Hi. Can you post the pic. I think I've seen it but not sure. Are you sure it wasn't Michael's spots. He did have a little spot/s in the middle of his chest.Tell me pleae wich one of this is?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI dont know if this was discussed but Arnold Klein states that he was out of the country for the month of May therefore Michael did not see him 3 times a week during that period.I saw pics of MJ supposedly leaving Kleins office wearing a mask but having a hairy chest. Other pics of MJ show him having no hairs on his chest. Unless someone can testify MJ shaved his chest, the I am inclined to believe it wasn't actually MJ. Hi. Can you post the pic. I think I've seen it but not sure. Are you sure it wasn't Michael's spots. He did have a little spot/s in the middle of his chest.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI dont know if this was discussed but Arnold Klein states that he was out of the country for the month of May therefore Michael did not see him 3 times a week during that period.I saw pics of MJ supposedly leaving Kleins office wearing a mask but having a hairy chest. Other pics of MJ show him having no hairs on his chest. Unless someone can testify MJ shaved his chest, the I am inclined to believe it wasn't actually MJ.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI dont know if this was discussed but Arnold Klein states that he was out of the country for the month of May therefore Michael did not see him 3 times a week during that period. I remember seeing that somewhere too. But the pictures clearly show a "Michael" coming and going to that office. I guess we could interpret that two ways:1) Klein is indirectly telling us that was not Michael 2) Michael was seeing another doctor there while Klein was gone.(there are other specialists in the office)---> in which case you'd have to wonder what was he going in for (which also would imply something more cosmetically complex than Kleins area of expertise).Michael Amir does mention the visit in his testimony, but he doesn't specify how long "Michael" was in the office. They might have given some clues as to what type of procedure was done. Although coming out "groggy" would imply something complex enough to be put under heavy anesthesia not just a local. Another weird thing just occured to me....in the trial the lawyers keep asking over and over if dentist use propofol. What would be the purpose in establishing that? Are they hinting at dental records? "Michael's" mouth was covered for alot of those visits (his standard black face mask), but when you pair that with the trial questions, it does make you wonder if they aren't getting at something else by bringing it up.Then you think back to Kleins bizarre "peeing in the cup" stories and then the constant mention of urine collection and testing in the trial....yet no one will ask the question thats hanging in the air..."What about Michael's DNA" Clearly dental records or urine sampling would establish that.....then again, maybe they aren't after Klein....maybe someone else in that office. :? That's a lot of good questions to think about.
My client’s practice was evaluated by the authorities and he was cleared of any wrong doing related to the death of his friend Michael Jackson.”
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI dont know if this was discussed but Arnold Klein states that he was out of the country for the month of May therefore Michael did not see him 3 times a week during that period.I saw pics of MJ supposedly leaving Kleins office wearing a mask but having a hairy chest. Other pics of MJ show him having no hairs on his chest. Unless someone can testify MJ shaved his chest, the I am inclined to believe it wasn't actually MJ. Hi. Can you post the pic. I think I've seen it but not sure. Are you sure it wasn't Michael's spots. He did have a little spot/s in the middle of his chest.Tell me pleae wich one of this is? I found this close-up. His outfit matches the photos above coming out of Klein's office
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI dont know if this was discussed but Arnold Klein states that he was out of the country for the month of May therefore Michael did not see him 3 times a week during that period.I saw pics of MJ supposedly leaving Kleins office wearing a mask but having a hairy chest. Other pics of MJ show him having no hairs on his chest. Unless someone can testify MJ shaved his chest, the I am inclined to believe it wasn't actually MJ. Hi. Can you post the pic. I think I've seen it but not sure. Are you sure it wasn't Michael's spots. He did have a little spot/s in the middle of his chest.Tell me pleae wich one of this is? I found this close-up. His outfit matches the photos above coming out of Klein's officeAccording to Jermaine's book, none of the Jacksons have hair on their chest. So hairy MJ is most likely not real MJ.
Please explain what you mean by the curly pattern is all wrong. How is that determined?