0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
But wrongful death is different. IF it's real court, then KJ REALLY IS suing AEG for a whole bunch of money KNOWING that her son is not dead, wrongful or otherwise. That's fraud. Period. We know that court is really going on right now and there's simply two explanations for that. ONE: KJ really is suing for wrongful death of a live MJ knowing he is not actually dead or TWO: court is being staged.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginSay MJ DID hoax the world and faked the Pepsi burn, hoaxing Pepsi in the process. Say Pepsi freaked out because they thought it was real. Say they would be suspicious if MJ did NOT have a grievance about it. Say MJ said "no really, it's alright, but to prove it's alright, and I'm not going to come back n sue you later, how about you donate some money to a children's hospital and we will call it good? Here, my PR department will spin it for the press and you guys will come out of it looking like heros... Pepsi agrees, everyone wins.Thanks for coming back to this bec. I was with you till the paragraph above! To me still, it's fraud! In that scenario you outline, everyone most certainly doesn't win. Pepsi were 'relieved' of 1.5million on a lie or put another way MJ gained 1.5million by deception. A court case, or lack of one, doesn't mean a crime wasn't committed, just that you were never found out or it never got to court.But...... like you, I don't believe MJ goes around committing crimes. So the only explanation my imagination can come up with IF the Pepsi accident was a hoax, is that Pepsi were in on it too and either agreed, behind the scenes, in a scenario similar to the one you put forward, to donate the money, or it was MJ's money all along.Like this maybe: MJ in secret to top Pepsi exec: " I want to donate some money to a Burns Unit but because I like a bit of drama and attention, how about we pretend I get burnt doing this commercial and then instead of suing you I get you to (pretend to) donate (my) money? Won't cost you anything, financially or in reputation, we have a bit of fun. Everyone wins!"Similarly, how about: MJ in secret to top AEG exec: " I want to build a Children's Hospital but because I like a bit of drama and attention, how about we pretend I die preparing for these concerts and then I get my mother to sue you and you (pretend to) pay her billions but it's really my money? After a while we'll come clean! Won't cost you anything, financially or in reputation, we have a bit of fun. Everyone (children especially) wins!" That's my brain workout for the morning! Love you bec!
Say MJ DID hoax the world and faked the Pepsi burn, hoaxing Pepsi in the process. Say Pepsi freaked out because they thought it was real. Say they would be suspicious if MJ did NOT have a grievance about it. Say MJ said "no really, it's alright, but to prove it's alright, and I'm not going to come back n sue you later, how about you donate some money to a children's hospital and we will call it good? Here, my PR department will spin it for the press and you guys will come out of it looking like heros... Pepsi agrees, everyone wins.
For me, that's not enough to suggest that Pepsi was in on it. I would need more.I don't think there's any such thing as "wrongful death attempt".
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginFor me, that's not enough to suggest that Pepsi was in on it. I would need more.I don't think there's any such thing as "wrongful death attempt".Well maybe I didn't explain myself correctly, the fact that Pepsi burn might be staged doesn't imply that Pepsi has to be in on it but Michael might have used this trade mark to make us think about the possibility that Pepsi burn might have been staged, the Pepsi cans were a big shoutout IMO, which is your theory about it??Here in Spain does exist "wrongful death attempt" when somebody tries unsuccessfully to kill a person , it's like AEG knowing Michael was in a bad condition however they asked him to do many more concerts and even hired an unsuitable Doctor who wasn't able to save his life, Michael escaped death in this case that's why we can call it "death attempt".
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginFor me, that's not enough to suggest that Pepsi was in on it. I would need more.I don't think there's any such thing as "wrongful death attempt".Well maybe I didn't explain myself correctly, the fact that Pepsi burn might be staged doesn't imply that Pepsi has to be in on it but Michael might have used this trade mark to make us think about the possibility that Pepsi burn might have been staged, the Pepsi cans were a big shoutout IMO, which is your theory about it??Here in Spain does exist "wrongful death attempt" when somebody tries unsuccessfully to kill a person , it's like AEG knowing Michael was in a bad condition however they asked him to do many more concerts and even hired an unsuitable Doctor who wasn't able to save his life, Michael escaped death in this case that's why we can call it "death attempt".Attempted murder exists... we you plan and attempt to kill someone and they survive. However, a manslaughter charge is when you kill someone w/o planning to do so. I don't believe than an Attempted Manslaughter charge exists.
Suspicious, I've also been thinking about the bridge 'accident'. KF has made a huge deal about it which is suspicous right there, since she's been a HUGE liar from the get-go, hoax-wise. Apparently MJ was upset that Kenny Ortega hadn't apologized for it and all this time MJ apparently wished he would. She said he finally 'sort of' apologized for it at TII rehearsals. Okay I believe KO is in on the hoax, because he has given many hoaxy clues such as at the memorial, "he was right here a week ago" (wrong), the Captain Hook quote You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login , and at the CM trial saying MJ was going to do his disappearing from the bed act the next day after his death.
Didn't want to lie while retouching what? :icon_lol: