0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
On another matter related to Anonymous - isn't Anonybook affiliated with the Anonymous group? If so, I am perplexed by why Anonybook has posted these 2 videos about a setup by Pauley Perrette (from NCIS) against her former husband Coyote Shivers (I had to look up who both of those people were because I had noooo idea... lol). I mean these are 2 actors essentially having a big almighty domestic after a divorce. Why would Anonybook bother with this when they have a greater purpose against the world's media and bankers and Facebook, government control etc ....the only connection I see is about Hollywood and Police corruption....Here are the 2 videos...I'd be interested in what everyone thinks.
How low will Facebook's stock go?(Money Watch) COMMENTARY If Morgan Stanley (MS) hadn't propped up Facebook's (FB) stock on Friday it would have easily closed below its $38 IPO price. If it couldn't get more momentum on the day it launched, what is it going to do now that the bloom is so suddenly off the rose? The market is clearly not buying the $100 billion valuation Mr. Zuckerberg and company tried to pawn off on the public. At midday Monday it is already down 11 percent to $34. So how low? $19? $20?...Remember what Joe Kennedy said before crash of 1929: "You know it's time to sell when shoeshine boys give you stock tips."
After V saying Anonybook was going to replace Facebook, it is interesting that Facebook is not doing well.QuoteHow low will Facebook's stock go?(Money Watch) COMMENTARY If Morgan Stanley (MS) hadn't propped up Facebook's (FB) stock on Friday it would have easily closed below its $38 IPO price. If it couldn't get more momentum on the day it launched, what is it going to do now that the bloom is so suddenly off the rose? The market is clearly not buying the $100 billion valuation Mr. Zuckerberg and company tried to pawn off on the public. At midday Monday it is already down 11 percent to $34. So how low? $19? $20?...Remember what Joe Kennedy said before crash of 1929: "You know it's time to sell when shoeshine boys give you stock tips."You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I think that Anonymous is the Osama Bin Laden on the internet. Bin Laden is the "terrorist" guilty of the attacks of 9/11, Anonymous will be the "terrorist" guilty of the future censorship of internet.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI think that Anonymous is the Osama Bin Laden on the internet. Bin Laden is the "terrorist" guilty of the attacks of 9/11, Anonymous will be the "terrorist" guilty of the future censorship of internet.Then you're saying that "they" are behind Anonymous, not Michael. Because "they" set up and prepared Osama Bin Laden, creating in the USA this fear of terrorists. This is the same with ALL the dictators that they have had to go and remove in the last 100+ years, thus justifying war and more control in all these countries. First "they" create the problem, then when the people cry for help and intervention, "they" come in with their "solution"--more power in their hands. That's how "they"ve taken over the minds, finances, politics, religion, territories of the entire world. Do you think V is their modus operandi?
Please, Front or TS, can you give us an indicator that MJ is or is not connected to Anonymous? :bowdown:The 'Jihad' video could be a good thing, but also could be a set-up or dis-information. It certainly looks like a rallying cry for people of ALL religions and regions against 'them', which is Michael's message.
But here's the tricky stuff! What if Michael decided to use exactly their own "weapons" against them and he basically uses their "modus operandi"!And here again, I need to remind you that Paris had a V mask as her twitter avatar for a while!So if Michael wasn't involved in this, he wouldn't let Paris post that pic, would he? :animal0017: