0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: "lovemj4everandever"The MOST CONCLUSIVE evidence that we have about the autopsy being FAKE (although there are dozens and dozens of obvious things) but the BIGGEST thing is that the ENTIRE autopsy report was dictated on 06/26/09 INCLUDING the OPINION on toxicology results. The ENTIRE DICTATION was typed on 06/30/09 INCLUDING the OPINION on the toxicology results. THE ENTIRE AUTOPSY REPORT was typed/transcribed on 06/30/09. The TOXICOLOGY results were NOT EVEN IN until 07/15/09 as dated on the toxicology reports. You cannot dictate and transcribe toxicology reports that are not in yet. :lol: :lol: Secondly, the coroner seal that appears on the autopsy report expired in 2004 and they changed to a new seal that year. The TOXICOLOGY reports have the new seal but the blood was drawn on a patient named "Trauma, Gershwen." The blood tubes must be labeled "Jackson, Michael." George Gershwen is a famous composer who wrote "It Ain't Necessarily So." Ira Gershwen is a famous composer who wrote "The Man That Got Away." There are dozens of other things that have already been discussed on other links here in the forum. But nothing about the autopsy is authentic. It is a good fake, until you look at the dates of dictation, dates of transcription, legal seals, and pay attention to the "legal" details such as how the blood tubes are labeled. :mrgreen: :mrgreen:I see where that is on those first pages (and I don't know why except maybe he made a preliminary finding) but I see toxicology results with the date of 8-19-09
The MOST CONCLUSIVE evidence that we have about the autopsy being FAKE (although there are dozens and dozens of obvious things) but the BIGGEST thing is that the ENTIRE autopsy report was dictated on 06/26/09 INCLUDING the OPINION on toxicology results. The ENTIRE DICTATION was typed on 06/30/09 INCLUDING the OPINION on the toxicology results. THE ENTIRE AUTOPSY REPORT was typed/transcribed on 06/30/09. The TOXICOLOGY results were NOT EVEN IN until 07/15/09 as dated on the toxicology reports. You cannot dictate and transcribe toxicology reports that are not in yet. :lol: :lol: Secondly, the coroner seal that appears on the autopsy report expired in 2004 and they changed to a new seal that year. The TOXICOLOGY reports have the new seal but the blood was drawn on a patient named "Trauma, Gershwen." The blood tubes must be labeled "Jackson, Michael." George Gershwen is a famous composer who wrote "It Ain't Necessarily So." Ira Gershwen is a famous composer who wrote "The Man That Got Away." There are dozens of other things that have already been discussed on other links here in the forum. But nothing about the autopsy is authentic. It is a good fake, until you look at the dates of dictation, dates of transcription, legal seals, and pay attention to the "legal" details such as how the blood tubes are labeled. :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
The ploy for allowing this info to surface and circulate world wide is obvious, MISTRIAL. :lol: No one goes to jail.In jurisprudence, prosecutorial misconduct is a procedural defense; via which, a defendant may argue that they should not be held criminally liable for actions which may have broken the law, because the prosecution acted in an "inappropriate" or "unfair" manner.
(BTW: Has no one commented on the "decedent had beard and mustache" as stated in coroner's report???)
Quote from: "Raven"Quote from: "tabloidburn" i lost my grandfather at 18, i dissolved myself in tears at his funeral and i wasn't able to do anything right for weeks, not even the basic stuff like eating or sleeping right (let go speak in public). if i just imagine having lost a parent at the age these kids are, there would be no way i could handle that. and no way i could see my dead parent with hoses and needles stuck in. and i would never expose a child to that.Not only that, but he is their only parent. Their world basically evolved around him, he was always around.exactly. i would have to have been drugged some kinda way to even stand sraight. either these kids are absolutely in control of themselves, then i humbly rest my case, or they know something we don't (yet)...
Quote from: "tabloidburn" i lost my grandfather at 18, i dissolved myself in tears at his funeral and i wasn't able to do anything right for weeks, not even the basic stuff like eating or sleeping right (let go speak in public). if i just imagine having lost a parent at the age these kids are, there would be no way i could handle that. and no way i could see my dead parent with hoses and needles stuck in. and i would never expose a child to that.Not only that, but he is their only parent. Their world basically evolved around him, he was always around.
i lost my grandfather at 18, i dissolved myself in tears at his funeral and i wasn't able to do anything right for weeks, not even the basic stuff like eating or sleeping right (let go speak in public). if i just imagine having lost a parent at the age these kids are, there would be no way i could handle that. and no way i could see my dead parent with hoses and needles stuck in. and i would never expose a child to that.
Quote from: "beatit"Quote from: "Liberian Girl Heehee"The autopsy report sure looks authentic, but there are enough strange things about it to make me go hmmmmm. :? I read the whole report and cried my eyes out. :cry: And, I didn't look at this site for an entire day, which I usually look over stuff at least once or twice a day. I almost gave up on beLIEving and having faith. But, then I came back and started reading all the posts about the report and now I have big doubts about it. I don't think anyone can say 100% that the report is authentic unless they watched the cornoner write it. IDK, but how can you be so certain.Remember....things don't always apear to be like it seems. 8-)One way to look at it is like this, I am an EMT, when I write a report on a call it become a legal document, if I lie in that report I have commit perjury. The reason being if my report is like it should be is basically taking my place in court. The only time they would call me in is if something in my report didn't make since. Same with a coroner. The difference is they are most of the time if not all the time called in to testify, so he would either have to commit perjury again or say something totally different than whats in his report with his signature on it and make himself look stupid.Just curious - wouldn't the autopsy report have the coroner's initials if he added information after the fact (toxicology report)? Also, I researched the internet a few days ago when this first came up and it specifically said the word "seal", not "logo" was replaced in 2004. Doesn't it seem odd that a seal (or logo) would be used that is 6 years old? Would it still be considered a valid document? I really don't know, that is why I'm asking.
Quote from: "Liberian Girl Heehee"The autopsy report sure looks authentic, but there are enough strange things about it to make me go hmmmmm. :? I read the whole report and cried my eyes out. :cry: And, I didn't look at this site for an entire day, which I usually look over stuff at least once or twice a day. I almost gave up on beLIEving and having faith. But, then I came back and started reading all the posts about the report and now I have big doubts about it. I don't think anyone can say 100% that the report is authentic unless they watched the cornoner write it. IDK, but how can you be so certain.Remember....things don't always apear to be like it seems. 8-)One way to look at it is like this, I am an EMT, when I write a report on a call it become a legal document, if I lie in that report I have commit perjury. The reason being if my report is like it should be is basically taking my place in court. The only time they would call me in is if something in my report didn't make since. Same with a coroner. The difference is they are most of the time if not all the time called in to testify, so he would either have to commit perjury again or say something totally different than whats in his report with his signature on it and make himself look stupid.
The autopsy report sure looks authentic, but there are enough strange things about it to make me go hmmmmm. :? I read the whole report and cried my eyes out. :cry: And, I didn't look at this site for an entire day, which I usually look over stuff at least once or twice a day. I almost gave up on beLIEving and having faith. But, then I came back and started reading all the posts about the report and now I have big doubts about it. I don't think anyone can say 100% that the report is authentic unless they watched the cornoner write it. IDK, but how can you be so certain.Remember....things don't always apear to be like it seems. 8-)
Other forum:You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
To me autopsy report looks authentic. But anyone who has some questions or any doubts, you can ask about this subject @ Pathology Forum:You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It was taken in early 2009BTW is this Michael anyway :?:
Started by *Mo* « 1 2 ... 7 8 » Dave Dave
Started by TruthBeTold « 1 2 ... 36 37 » Other Odd Things
Started by looking4truth « 1 2 ... 1088 1089 » Back/Front discussions
Started by *Mo* Pictures & Videos of Michael
Started by badkolo « 1 2 ... 73 74 » The Double Theory
