Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators
Latest News => Michael Jackson News => Topic started by: ladylee1979 on June 15, 2010, 06:25:51 AM
-
When Michael Jackson took the stage on March 6 in London to announce that he would be performing again come summer of 2009 at London’s O2 Arena, fans were certain they were in the presence of a living legend. With all this, speculation is now running rampant that the person they got to cheer for and applaud was not even Michael to begin with, but a very convincing look-alike – at least that’s what Paul Harris of the British publication Daily Mail seems to believe.There are more things that simply seem off about Michael’s recent appearance, which would indicate that he was not the real deal, Harris says. For starters, the star’s chin was too square, even when accounting recent plastic surgery he might have had. However, if the chin is not enough to prove that the person on stage was not Michael, then there is the question of his voice, which was, according to Harris, too bassy to be Jackson’s. And that of his walk, which suddenly seemed more hunched – a strange thing for such a skilled dancer as Michael is “Was the quivering figure in the aviator shades and sparkly jacket that day an imposter?” Harris asks. “[…] The walk, an awkward, loping stride. He paused momentarily beside a golf cart, probably assuming it was going to take him into the arena – but was ushered in on foot. Next, the voice. The few words he stumbled over at the microphone had far more bass than many expected. If you closed your eyes you would surely have had trouble identifying him as the more familiar, childlike 50-year-old. […] Trouble is, surgery and image enhancement mean that few people really know what MJ will look like when they meet him.” Harris further explains.
According to this theory, and many others now circulating freely on the Internet, Michael himself decided to go for a double for the press announcement either because of a tumble he had taken only hours before (which was caught on tape), or because he was too ill to attend. Canceling the announcement was not, understandably, an option on account of the fact that many fans and reporters had already gathered for it, and there was a lot of money at stake.
Be that as it may, Michael’s team insists the theory is as “ridiculous” as it gets. If the person on stage was not Michael Jackson, this is perhaps because Elvis Presley was at the press conference too, says a statement coming from the singer’s camp.
-
When Michael Jackson took the stage on March 6 in London to announce that he would be performing again come summer of 2009 at London’s O2 Arena, fans were certain they were in the presence of a living legend. With all this, speculation is now running rampant that the person they got to cheer for and applaud was not even Michael to begin with, but a very convincing look-alike – at least that’s what Paul Harris of the British publication Daily Mail seems to believe.There are more things that simply seem off about Michael’s recent appearance, which would indicate that he was not the real deal, Harris says. For starters, the star’s chin was too square, even when accounting recent plastic surgery he might have had. However, if the chin is not enough to prove that the person on stage was not Michael, then there is the question of his voice, which was, according to Harris, too bassy to be Jackson’s. And that of his walk, which suddenly seemed more hunched – a strange thing for such a skilled dancer as Michael is “Was the quivering figure in the aviator shades and sparkly jacket that day an imposter?” Harris asks. “[…] The walk, an awkward, loping stride. He paused momentarily beside a golf cart, probably assuming it was going to take him into the arena – but was ushered in on foot. Next, the voice. The few words he stumbled over at the microphone had far more bass than many expected. If you closed your eyes you would surely have had trouble identifying him as the more familiar, childlike 50-year-old. […] Trouble is, surgery and image enhancement mean that few people really know what MJ will look like when they meet him.” Harris further explains.
According to this theory, and many others now circulating freely on the Internet, Michael himself decided to go for a double for the press announcement either because of a tumble he had taken only hours before (which was caught on tape), or because he was too ill to attend. Canceling the announcement was not, understandably, an option on account of the fact that many fans and reporters had already gathered for it, and there was a lot of money at stake.
Be that as it may, Michael’s team insists the theory is as “ridiculous” as it gets. If the person on stage was not Michael Jackson, this is perhaps because Elvis Presley was at the press conference too, says a statement coming from the singer’s camp.
The statement from the singer's camp (who I wonder?) is interesting. In light of recent speculation maybe Elvis was at the press conference!! :o
-
I knew it it was not MJ at the press conference. His voice, and he repeated over and over this is it. this is it. Since when MJ has loss for words??
-
Okay, so now people in the press are starting to question this too? Hmm...
-
I know most of us don't like to believe in the double theories but whatever happen to MJ may have started at the O2 announcemet something is odd was going on that day.
-
When Michael Jackson took the stage on March 6 in London to announce that he would be performing again come summer of 2009 at London’s O2 Arena, fans were certain they were in the presence of a living legend. With all this, speculation is now running rampant that the person they got to cheer for and applaud was not even Michael to begin with, but a very convincing look-alike – at least that’s what Paul Harris of the British publication Daily Mail seems to believe.There are more things that simply seem off about Michael’s recent appearance, which would indicate that he was not the real deal, Harris says. For starters, the star’s chin was too square, even when accounting recent plastic surgery he might have had. However, if the chin is not enough to prove that the person on stage was not Michael, then there is the question of his voice, which was, according to Harris, too bassy to be Jackson’s. And that of his walk, which suddenly seemed more hunched – a strange thing for such a skilled dancer as Michael is “Was the quivering figure in the aviator shades and sparkly jacket that day an imposter?” Harris asks. “[…] The walk, an awkward, loping stride. He paused momentarily beside a golf cart, probably assuming it was going to take him into the arena – but was ushered in on foot. Next, the voice. The few words he stumbled over at the microphone had far more bass than many expected. If you closed your eyes you would surely have had trouble identifying him as the more familiar, childlike 50-year-old. […] Trouble is, surgery and image enhancement mean that few people really know what MJ will look like when they meet him.” Harris further explains.
According to this theory, and many others now circulating freely on the Internet, Michael himself decided to go for a double for the press announcement either because of a tumble he had taken only hours before (which was caught on tape), or because he was too ill to attend. Canceling the announcement was not, understandably, an option on account of the fact that many fans and reporters had already gathered for it, and there was a lot of money at stake.
Be that as it may, Michael’s team insists the theory is as “ridiculous” as it gets. If the person on stage was not Michael Jackson, this is perhaps because Elvis Presley was at the press conference too, says a statement coming from the singer’s camp.
The statement from the singer's camp (who I wonder?) is interesting. In light of recent speculation maybe Elvis was at the press conference!! :o
[/color]
hmm that seems an unnessesary statement . yet they made it.
-
I knew it all along, folks. 8-) :P
-
IT'S WAS ABOUT TIME, SEEMS PPL ARE TAKING NOTICE OF THE OBSERVATIONS OF THIS FORUM. FAKE WILL YES IT WAS ON HERE FIRST!!! NOW, WAS O2 MJ A DOUBLE? UNRAVELING TIME HAS BEGUN. :lol:
-
[/quote]Be that as it may, Michael’s team insists the theory is as “ridiculous” as it gets. If the person on stage was not Michael Jackson, this is perhaps because Elvis Presley was at the press conference too, says a statement coming from the singer’s camp.[/quote]
This may not be far from the truth :lol:
-
This is not a recently released article. This article is from MARCH 14, 2009.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... ckson.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1161879/The-square-chin-The-deep-voice-But-really-Michael-Jackson.html)
This fellow, Paul Harris, also wrote another article right after the O2 Press Conference. From March 6, 2009.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... rance.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1159645/Trembling-gaunt-100million-debt-Michael-Jackson-makes-final-entrance.html)
-
I knew it all along, folks. 8-) :P
Me too! Compare details on the items described below, with photos and videos in the period 1998-2007. Moreover, the man of the conference is younger (35 years).
- Mouth, teeth, smile
- Nose
- Jaw chin / fissure
- The hands, nails
- Mannerisms very sharp (less sensitive)
-
35 what? 35years old? 35years younger? ^^
-
I always thought that was not Michael at the 02 arena,just was not right at all,but when they say do to recent findings that means Jacksons camp is reading about Elvis from thisisalsoit or the one behind it!
-
35 what? 35years old? 35years younger? ^^
I want to say that Mike had 50 years of age. Who appeared at the press conference, seems to have 35 years of age. :roll:
-
this is the real michael
-
I knew it all along, folks. 8-) :P
Me too! Compare details on the items described below, with photos and videos in the period 1998-2007. Moreover, the man of the conference is younger (35 years).
- Mouth, teeth, smile
- Nose
- Jaw chin / fissure
- The hands, nails
- Mannerisms very sharp (less sensitive)
Yup! 8-)
-
Its an old article...I came across this last year :|
-
Im not getting into this argument.. except to say look at the posts that are on this forum disproving this. mykidsmum (i think it was her) - did a lot of facial analysis and ive also posted about the arthiris in his fingers.
Anyway.. it was the real MJ at O2
But what i really want to know.. what fall that MJ had which was caught on tape are they talking about?
-
There we go again:
Michael
not Michael
Michael
not Michael
Michael
not Michael
Michael
not Michael
Michael
not Michael
Michael
not Michael
Michael
not Michael
Michael
not Michael
:mrgreen:
-
But what i really want to know.. what fall that MJ had which was caught on tape are they talking about?
Well the Daily Mail article says "The (speculative) theory is that Jackson - filmed falling on the steps of his minibus before it left for the Arena -"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... z0qx4RZWQG (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1161879/The-square-chin-The-deep-voice-But-really-Michael-Jackson.html#ixzz0qx4RZWQG)
Here are a few links to youtubes from that time - I couldn't find any where I actually saw him fall getting into the bus - but here is a link to one of him boarding the bus from his hotel to the O2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9uaM69D ... re=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9uaM69DKJI&feature=related)
And in this link you get the idea of how crazy it was, and how easy it would have been for him to get hurt in the crush of people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSTmn9O1 ... re=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSTmn9O1SAs&feature=related)
and this one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdzCd_Pc ... re=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdzCd_Pc17Y&feature=related)
-
Im not getting into this argument.. except to say look at the posts that are on this forum disproving this. mykidsmum (i think it was her) - did a lot of facial analysis and ive also posted about the arthiris in his fingers.
Anyway.. it was the real MJ at O2
But what i really want to know.. what fall that MJ had which was caught on tape are they talking about?
Totally agree --- O2 man WAS THE REAL MICHAEL
I know, I know iam one of the very few also that believe this but no way in hell was that a "double"
-
Me too.
-
I read somewhere that michael had a fall that is why he had marks on his hands I always felt it was michael there but not him self ie he was upset angry alMost made up to not look like himself for some reason when I fist saw him I thought what the heck is wrong but it's him I am pretty certain but I have never sen the video of him falling so don't k ow what that was about
-
i dont know where i found this picture heck it might have been on this site lol
but look at the picture..(http://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z112/sue_suzz/9ad6f0328d3e6942cd243de2d6a06193-1.png)
huggs n faith to all
suzz
-
Let's go round in circles.... anyone? Except for Elvis... he is new in this adventure! :lol: :mrgreen:
-
Im not getting into this argument.. except to say look at the posts that are on this forum disproving this. mykidsmum (i think it was her) - did a lot of facial analysis and ive also posted about the arthiris in his fingers.
Anyway.. it was the real MJ at O2
But what i really want to know.. what fall that MJ had which was caught on tape are they talking about?
So let's fight a battle, because I say that Mike was not in the London conference. Compared minutely every detail (teeth, mouth, smile ...) with pictures and videos of recent years, especially 2007. The differences are huge!
-
this is the real michael
the harder and longer I stare at those pics the more and more its clear that they arent all the same person, What I am noticing is that throughout the years and after plastic surgery we have a double,stand-in, doppleganger or whatever you want to call him that has gotten closer and closer to looking like michael to the point where you cant tell who is who, I guess thats the whole point in having a double for security and other reasons.
BUT>>>> if you look extremely close and let your mind open a little, there is subtle difference in the nose, eyebrow and lip area that simply dont match, and its not camera angles or lighting thats causing these differences but to really SEE WHERE these difference truly are, look at the cleft, the clefts are so different and that doesnt change on its own in a matter of days. Look at the cleft and you can clearly see they dont match, some are tight and long and perfect while the other cleft is open and small while the other is sloppy all together. Clefts that have been made by a surgeon dont change on a daily basis.
Its all in the cleft.
-
If all is in agreement that the person at the press conference was not MJ than where was Michael Jackson?
-
If the person on stage was not Michael Jackson, this is perhaps because Elvis Presley was at the press conference too, says a statement coming from the singer’s camp.
What an interesting thing to say. Elvis was at the press conference too? hmmm Well maybe he was there too. :lol:
-
this is the real michael
the harder and longer I stare at those pics the more and more its clear that they arent all the same person, What I am noticing is that throughout the years and after plastic surgery we have a double,stand-in, doppleganger or whatever you want to call him that has gotten closer and closer to looking like michael to the point where you cant tell who is who, I guess thats the whole point in having a double for security and other reasons.
BUT>>>> if you look extremely close and let your mind open a little, there is subtle difference in the nose, eyebrow and lip area that simply dont match, and its not camera angles or lighting thats causing these differences but to really SEE WHERE these difference truly are, look at the cleft, the clefts are so different and that doesnt change on its own in a matter of days. Look at the cleft and you can clearly see they dont match, some are tight and long and perfect while the other cleft is open and small while the other is sloppy all together. Clefts that have been made by a surgeon dont change on a daily basis.
Its all in the cleft.
(http://i46.tinypic.com/dmvbbq.jpg)
What about this picture? I think it tells all. The bone structure and all of the face features fit/match with real Michael 100%. None of us look the same in all of our pictures. I can't even recognize myself in some of my pictures. So I believe that 02 guy was Michael himself.
-
This is not a recently released article. This article is from MARCH 14, 2009.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... ckson.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1161879/The-square-chin-The-deep-voice-But-really-Michael-Jackson.html)
This fellow, Paul Harris, also wrote another article right after the O2 Press Conference. From March 6, 2009.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... rance.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1159645/Trembling-gaunt-100million-debt-Michael-Jackson-makes-final-entrance.html)
God bless you for the links. I have heard about what Mr. Harris said in an interview about the facial and vocal differences at the O2 conference. I am so happy to have the article links for reference. Thank you so much! :)
this is the real michael
Brillant photo comparsion. God bless you for your love and your research, Samsuperb! :)
-
by mumof3 » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:05 pm
I read somewhere that michael had a fall that is why he had marks on his hands I always felt it was michael there but not him self ie he was upset angry alMost made up to not look like himself for some reason when I fist saw him I thought what the heck is wrong but it's him I am pretty certain but I have never sen the video of him falling so don't k ow what that was about
Michael Jackson had a fall from the CAR transporting him to 02.
He did not want to do the 02 announcement. I had wondered if he tried
to get OUT of the car. But that is only my thoughts. I never saw the video,
but someone saw it happen.
DID Michael have marks on his hands at 02? If so, this supports that
rumor. Or one could ask, if that was Michael Jackson that had the fall?
Did Tohme pull him back inside?
I either thought when I see him walk inside, that he high on oxycotin or
it not him at all.
I think everyone is getting paid off, there were more loose-lips in the
beginning.
-
Lets not get all sarcastic and angry on each otehr and get caught up in this whole double thingy again.....
Let Michael himself settle the whole thing when he comes out for himself.....
If he says it from his own mouth taht he used a double, we'll believe it.
End of argument. :|
-
I was always 50%-50% whether is was MJ at 02 conference.
If it was not Michael, then "see you in July" is not a clue anymore?
-
Ihave posted this before,but i thought i would again just because someone new might not have seen it,ive always found it strange how dermot says when michael hugged him it felt like he was ripped,and had strong back muscles,but there were people at the time saying he was frail,very under weight,ive even heard people say he was like a dancing skeleton,i dont know,its just somthing that has stuck in my mind,i really dont know what to make of it all. :) xx [youtube:3an3x9y8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uA7ZEYp8tk[/youtube:3an3x9y8]
-
Ihave posted this before,but i thought i would again just because someone new might not have seen it,ive always found it strange how dermot says when michael hugged him it felt like he was ripped,and had strong back muscles,but there were people at the time saying he was frail,very under weight,ive even heard people say he was like a dancing skeleton,i dont know,its just somthing that has stuck in my mind,i really dont know what to make of it all. :) xx [youtube:176ejsd8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uA7ZEYp8tk[/youtube:176ejsd8]
I remember this too good! Great, Dermot! :lol:
What's about "Michael"s stomach muscles? :D :oops:
In my opinion: This is a clue for a double at O2.
-
i dont know where i found this picture heck it might have been on this site lol
but look at the picture..(http://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z112/sue_suzz/9ad6f0328d3e6942cd243de2d6a06193-1.png)
huggs n faith to all
suzz
Wtf? Is this picture photoshopped? Now I recognize nobobdy there...Michael nor O2-guy... :?
@tekamjforever
35 years old...15years older than me...:(
How damn much I hate my life. It's so f*cking unfair! :cry:
-
if it was a real Michael in O2 then he was and is very healthy, and if it was not Michael then he didn't have time to announce fake concert tour coz he was busy... stage you death is hard job.. he had to prepare! :lol: :lol: :lol:
-
Let's go round in circles.... anyone? Except for Elvis... he is new in this adventure! :lol: :mrgreen:
Im beginning to think that we are getting lots and lots of distractions all part of this illusion we are all living through for the last 11 months :roll:
Such confusion dont it make you wanna scream! :lol:
-
Another thought just crossed my mind,why did they ring dermot only the day before the 02,that seems to be leaving it a bit late in the day for somthing that important, shouldnt it have all been arranged for a at least a while,only thing i can think of,maybe someone else was supposed to do it,and let them down,not sure. :? :?
-
I can´t take it, I caaaaaan´t
(http://dl9.glitter-graphics.net/pub/2082/2082869x3dsja5cun.gif) (http://www.glitter-graphics.com)
I am still 50% 50% on this
-
This article is about 15 months old, and though I believe it was Michael at the o2 Arena, I have always asked why didn't Michael himself ever said anything about these rumors. Of course, the press has said so many BS about him, that he just probably thought it wasn't even worth commenting. Maybe that's what Michael wanted, to create this illusion of a double...
-
Ok, usually I dont mix in conversations, but as I read this I was thinking:
A man that looks that much like Michael, would have to go in hiding for the rest of his life.
It is not possible that that is a double, because he would have been seen one day or another.
You must understand, for example, if michael would be dead, this man can never go anywhere anymore.
Ok, thats it.
-
I knew it all along, folks. 8-) :P
Me too! Compare details on the items described below, with photos and videos in the period 1998-2007. Moreover, the man of the conference is younger (35 years).
- Mouth, teeth, smile
- Nose
- Jaw chin / fissure
- The hands, nails
- Mannerisms very sharp (less sensitive)
I haven't changed my mind since the double theory. I too, believe that wasn't Michael. What got me was last year when all of the tribute magazines came out; I bought quite a few. I was flabergasted when I saw the 02 guy as MJ in some of them. I don't know who was at the conference in March 2009. I just know it wasn't Michael Jackson. Keep the Faith!
-
If he hadn't looked so diferent in TII (facially nothing like 02 guy), I may have been convinced but I'm still wondering to this day.
-
If he hadn't looked so diferent in TII (facially nothing like 02 guy), I may have been convinced but I'm still wondering to this day.
Yeah, O2's chin is MASSIVE, but the fake(s) (not certain if there's one or more in TII) in the movie have small chins- smaller than the real MJ and especially smaller than O2's chin..
-
by mumof3 » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:05 pm
I read somewhere that michael had a fall that is why he had marks on his hands I always felt it was michael there but not him self ie he was upset angry alMost made up to not look like himself for some reason when I fist saw him I thought what the heck is wrong but it's him I am pretty certain but I have never sen the video of him falling so don't k ow what that was about
Michael Jackson had a fall from the CAR transporting him to 02.
He did not want to do the 02 announcement. I had wondered if he tried
to get OUT of the car. But that is only my thoughts. I never saw the video,
but someone saw it happen.
DID Michael have marks on his hands at 02? If so, this supports that
rumor. Or one could ask, if that was Michael Jackson that had the fall?
Did Tohme pull him back inside?
I either thought when I see him walk inside, that he high on oxycotin or
it not him at all.
I think everyone is getting paid off, there were more loose-lips in the
beginning.
Someone even posted pictures about his clothes being dirty from make-up or whatever on the old forum. Even his pants had stains! So I think this supports that theory that he was probably struggling to get out of that car...Oh God, I dont even want to imagine what he went through, if this is true :cry:
-
Ok, usually I dont mix in conversations, but as I read this I was thinking:
A man that looks that much like Michael, would have to go in hiding for the rest of his life.
It is not possible that that is a double, because he would have been seen one day or another.
You must understand, for example, if michael would be dead, this man can never go anywhere anymore.
Ok, thats it.
O2-guy doesn't look like Mike, even in sunglasses, wig, MJ-jacket, and make up. Do you think he would look like him without these? Even I could look like Michael if i would put these things on myself. As much as he does..i could.
I can't believe that this is still a question.
-
After nearly twelve months of comparing michaels hair,teeth,nose,ears,eyes,chin,hands,nails,walk and body language !
we have come to the conclusion that we still can`t make are minds up. :lol:
if mj is still alive and that was a double than it was a bloody good one.
-
I agree with the people who say the 02 guy is not Michael. It is a subtle difference, but it is there. The lips are fuller and more curved and the nose is slightly different. He does not as gracefully as does MJ. I've never seen MJ laugh that way. The double was also trying to find the appropriate pitch when speaking, "these....will be my last performances in London." I think the most important question is why was a double used? Were they forcing MJ to do something he didn't want to do? Was it Tohme Tohme who was pushing him to get out there?
-
i just thought of somthing else,at the 02 behind the stage, when mj got out of the bus,at one point he went as if to get into the buggy,but they got hold of his arm and guided him away,as if he didnt know what to do and seemed a bit lost,but wouldnt mj know exactly what to do,hes been doing things like this for years,not sure if im making any sense.xx :oops: :)
-
I think this can be determine by the following:
DID 02 dude have the stains, and scraped hand, and is the
02 dude the SAME one that that Tohme :evil: was forcing to get
into building. If so, I believe it to be Michael Jackson.
There is no reason why imposter/michael would try to BAIL.
SO, if there is no scape on 02 Michael Jackson, he is a double
and get paid no matter what. He could be lined up already in
building, because Michael Jackson DID not want to go to give
the speech.
-
This article is about 15 months old, and though I believe it was Michael at the o2 Arena, I have always asked why didn't Michael himself ever said anything about these rumors. Of course, the press has said so many BS about him, that he just probably thought it wasn't even worth commenting. Maybe that's what Michael wanted, to create this illusion of a double...
maybe so . and maybe it has been going on for a while.
-
or may be all was just an illution.....
-
Let's go round in circles.... anyone? Except for Elvis... he is new in this adventure! :lol: :mrgreen:
Im beginning to think that we are getting lots and lots of distractions all part of this illusion we are all living through for the last 11 months :roll:
Such confusion dont it make you wanna scream! :lol:
Indeed. I feel like im on the Magic Roundabout. :roll:
Oh and just to drop this in.. I went to see Whitney Houston on Wednesday. She was talking about Michael and they played loads of his songs. I cried. Lots. :(
-
i really believe he was someone else in London...dont know why i just feel like that...
do we know who this man might have been if not Mike? :?
-
i really believe he was someone else in London...dont know why i just feel like that...
do we know who this man might have been if not Mike? :?
I've no idea abt it.
-
i really believe he was someone else in London...dont know why i just feel like that...
do we know who this man might have been if not Mike? :?
I've no idea abt it.
I believe this was someone MJ had never revealed to the public before. All of the others were imitators. This guy is more or less a double. Keep the Faith!
-
i really believe he was someone else in London...dont know why i just feel like that...
do we know who this man might have been if not Mike? :?
I've no idea abt it.
I know, Goof. I just didn't acknowledge that feeling 'til learning of the hoax, even though I knew "he" was off at the O2..
-
I like O2 Mike I still don't know if it was Mike, but yes TII Mike the facial structure is really different. TDCAU Mike that is Mike!!! O2 looks different in my head I try to compare those two and nope.
-
did i hear somewhere here that there has been thought of micheal using a double before this investigation began.i mean like years before but it was actually noticed at the time.
-
i dont know where i found this picture heck it might have been on this site lol
but look at the picture..(http://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z112/sue_suzz/9ad6f0328d3e6942cd243de2d6a06193-1.png)
huggs n faith to all
suzz
Wtf? Is this picture photoshopped? Now I recognize nobobdy there...Michael nor O2-guy... :?
@tekamjforever
35 years old...15years older than me...:(
How damn much I hate my life. It's so f*cking unfair! :cry:
i dont know if its photoshop or not..but if you make the picture bigger it doesnt look like our mj..the nose is really different just for starters..idk..i just never seen that picture b4 and wanted to post it and see if anyone could tell if it is photoshop...
huggs n faith to all
suzz
-
I think in the press conference was not Michael. For me the reason is very simple. Michael knew that he would not do the concerts and did not want to mislead people that way. In this served the double.