0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I think Joe is right.
I was just watching HeadLineNews and they interviewed Dr. Sanjay Gupta. Gupta and a legal correspondent for HLN agree that MJ could have possibly injected himself with more propofol. The legal correspondent says "it's not a bad defense." Gupta says it's actually possible but not necessarily probable. However, he says, given that MJ had a high tolerance for these drugs, MJ might not have been too groggy and could have injected himself if the IV was in his arm.It appears as if the mainstream media is prepping the public to believe this lie. :?
What happens if both the prosecution and the defense each call a propofol expert and they both have a dif story? Then what...?
Quote from: "Truth_or_Dare"What happens if both the prosecution and the defense each call a propofol expert and they both have a dif story? Then what...?Then I need to get more popcorn :lol:
jill wrote: SoldierofLOVE wrote:I was just watching HeadLineNews and they interviewed Dr. Sanjay Gupta. Gupta and a legal correspondent for HLN agree that MJ could have possibly injected himself with more propofol. The legal correspondent says "it's not a bad defense." Gupta says it's actually possible but not necessarily probable. However, he says, given that MJ had a high tolerance for these drugs, MJ might not have been too groggy and could have injected himself if the IV was in his arm.It appears as if the mainstream media is prepping the public to believe this lie. Interesting, they just had doctor who supposedly is an expert on propofal on Fox News who just said the opposite. He said it would have been impossible for MJ to inject himself with the drug because the second it hit his vein he would become paralized. I guess everyone has their own view of this.