Blog

[MJonmind]

Who I remember giving a surprise testimony was Debbie Rowe. People thought that she would not be on Michael´s side and then, BAM!

if you can't give her credit for anything else you have to give her credit for that. i was pretty amazed at how much info about the people around michael that tom m. was able to draw out during her testimony.

Back seems very negative about Debbie.

[suspicious mind]

Who I remember giving a surprise testimony was Debbie Rowe. People thought that she would not be on Michael´s side and then, BAM!

if you can't give her credit for anything else you have to give her credit for that. i was pretty amazed at how much info about the people around michael that tom m. was able to draw out during her testimony.

Back seems very negative about Debbie.

really , do you have the post ?

while i am here , this is off topic and very  :-[ but i can't seem to find where to log out ??? i don' t wanna be locked up here for the rest of my life ;D

[MissG]

 ;D ;D

My only question is...where is that user, Back?. The easiest way for us to know about any user is if that member uses the same name and if not, just inform people, as any other does.

Why would Back hide behind another name? May be Back has no idea this forum even exists.

[Front]

 :o

<looks around...doesn't recognize anything>

hmm.....did the old board hoax its death? Souza baby, you trying to BAMboozle us?  :P  ;)

Ladies, if you need something to hold onto,  8) Backstroke with yours truly into the new Frontier.  ;)

Looking good S, can't wait to see the final product.

Gema---perhaps there's a good reason why Back is hiding under a different user name, IF in fact he is. Perhaps there's a damn good reason why "certain things are not meant to be ascertained in the MOMENT".  :-X

Continued on the flipside.............................   

[Front]

 :o

28...  :o 71...80...  ;D 37...  8)

roll that dice, gotta check it twice
centrifuging on the vial
Light Man spinning all the while
Exhibit B gonna rock that trial

the "N"ew, the "CHA_GE" --- if it makes you wonder
relapse back, mesh letter to number
won't be long 'til you hear that thunder...............

p.s. BRANG the old smileys BACK!!!  >:(

[BeTheChange]

Front,

I pray and long for the day when I can understand what the heck you mean whenever, and whatever, you post.

And I also pray that it won't take 5 years to figure it out.

With L.O.V.E. always.

[Elsa]

Front, I'm a little confused by your method - I've read some posts about your numbers but I'm not sure how it works.

Looking at the capitals
L=12 or 21
M=13 or 31
So a combination of 12,13/13,12 or 21,31/31,21  ???
Either way 13+12= 25 and 31+21= 52

E= 5 B= 2 which is also either 25 or 52

There have been discussions on this forum about the Pepsi accident being the midpoint of the 'official' birth and death dates with 25 years on either side and this year would be 52 years.  Both numbers seem relevant.

The letter to number for CHA_GE  is 381_75.  12 or 21 on each side?

Is Exhibit B for Murray's trial a vial?  Is that online somewhere?

Also, just realized the letter/number for BACK is 17 - or 71.  :o

[MissG]

:o

<looks around...doesn't recognize anything>

hmm.....did the old board hoax its death? Souza baby, you trying to BAMboozle us?  :P  ;)

Ladies, if you need something to hold onto,  8) Backstroke with yours truly into the new Frontier.  ;)

Looking good S, can't wait to see the final product.

Gema---perhaps there's a good reason why Back is hiding under a different user name, IF in fact he is. Perhaps there's a damn good reason why "certain things are not meant to be ascertained in the MOMENT".  :-X

Continued on the flipside.............................

Riddle me this, riddle me that...at the end no one (me) understands what you write anyway.

So much mystery and riddles make difficult to have just a plain chat about what happened to Michael and share different theories regarding the possible hoax.

So, what are those reasons, according to you, why a person (Back)  would not say which member he/she was?

[MissG]

:o

28...  :o 71...80...  ;D 37...  8)

BINGO

[MissG]

If we read the opening post of this thread, nothing is new. The "simmering" has been on since long ago.

I am going to re-read  the theory, which makes references to Jesus, Archangel Michael, Evan Chandler.

BACK is a member of the MJJC message board which is one of the largest Michael Jackson fan club message boards.  In 2005 and 2006, he posted some interesting posts that refer to this adventure we are on right now. I just want to pick out some of the posts that stand out. However, you can check out all of them HERE: <!-- m -->http://mjkit.forumotion.net/michael-s-f ... light=back<!-- m -->.  A HUGE thanks goes to Pammy for taking the time to posting all of these. Please look at the dates and times of these posts.

One of his most popular posts was of the New 7 Day Theory, which was posted by BACK on June 25, 2006 in response to a thread about 2Pac and his seven day theory. The comparison between 2Pac and Michael was recently mentioned on TMZ (<!-- m -->http://www.tmz.com/2010/01/03/michael-j ... other-day/<!-- m -->). These posts may be hard to comprehend at first. However, it is one of the most convincing pieces I've read from an "informer". Please look at the date and time and also note the mention of Mystery777, another member on that same board that folks thought to be MJ. Here is a post from that member: <!-- m -->http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/2905/mystery777.jpg<!-- m -->.

Here is the theory: <!-- m -->http://img66.imageshack.us/img66/1197/52582006.jpg<!-- m -->
Here is another screenshot that's in reference to his 7 Day theory: <!-- m -->http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/664/625820062.jpg<!-- m -->

After June 25th, BACK posted a conclusion of sorts about his theory, which makes references to Jesus, Archangel Michael, Evan Chandler and also this being 20 years in the making: <!-- m -->http://mjkit.forumotion.net/video-s-hoa ... 937-25.htm<!-- m --> (screenshots are towards the middle of the page. If you wish to just read the text only, you can go to the first page of the thread)

The conclusion may make some people a little uncomfortable and indifference towards BACK but please continue to read. You may disagree with him on some things but other things cannot be denied. For instance, this post about This is It: http://img394.imageshack.us/img394/1723/1382007thisi.png  and this post about one day of simmering: <!-- m -->http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/7841/10t ... 252610.jpg<!-- m -->. Haven't we heard MJ say the word "simmering" quite a bit in the movie, This is it? I have also written a post about how the TII post could be connected with the three sevens MJ wore in the movie HERE: <!-- l -->viewtopic.php?f=17&t=3635<!-- l -->.

Are these posts just mere coincidences?  It's up to you but I think we all know how we feel about coincidences.

Here are a few other interesting posts from BACK:
Not a comeback but a TAKEOVER: <!-- m -->http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/1641 ... ver161.jpg<!-- m -->
Check your future history books: <!-- m -->http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/6225/2462007.jpg<!-- m -->
The King is BACK: <!-- m -->http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/3492/kingisback.jpg<!-- m -->
Media Failed: <!-- m -->http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/8514/mediafailed.jpg<!-- m --> (Even mentions Harvey Levin, that lawyer that runs TMZ...hmmm...)

Some members believed/believe that he is MJ himself. I am not too sure of that but I do believe that he is "in the know".

And do you notice a certain catch phrase in his posts? Keep Watchin? Listen closely @ 00:18 of the official preview of TII: <!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDXND33oDQ0<!-- m --> (Thanks to members at the old board for finding that). And remember what TMZ folks said to some of us hoax believers when confronted about the R.I.P. list? Keep watching! (<!-- l -->viewtopic.php?f=48&t=4896<!-- l -->)

So sometimes my dear believers that are losing faith after today, we have to look BACK to move FORWARD. <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->

[MissG]

arms, wrist and feet, bludgeoned through the veins
arms, wrist and feet, poisoned through the veins
two different kings with different reigns
at the end the result shall be the same

http://twitpic.com/q3nu7

No idea if this poem is talking about God/Devil or 2 Michaels. However, "arms, wrist and feet, poisoned through the veins" sounds like the image of someone using needles.

[MissG]

Does Back believe in Angels? :o

http://twitpic.com/q3nsu

[Sarah31]

:o

28...  :o 71...80...  ;D 37...  8)

BINGO

LOL.

This new board is confusing, too confusing for me. Makes it even harder to try and understand Front's posts. Not that I have a problem with crazy or weird, I like crazy and weird, but once in a while I also just like to read clear statements. So WTF are you talking about, Front? Maybe he doesn't know either, wouldn't surprise me, It probably is some form of Bingo coming from some alternate universe.

[suspicious mind]

Who I remember giving a surprise testimony was Debbie Rowe. People thought that she would not be on Michael´s side and then, BAM!

if you can't give her credit for anything else you have to give her credit for that. i was pretty amazed at how much info about the people around michael that tom m. was able to draw out during her testimony.

Back seems very negative about Debbie.

hey frontwhat is backs problem with debbie ? :o

really , do you have the post ?

while i am here , this is off topic and very  :-[ but i can't seem to find where to log out ??? i don' t wanna be locked up here for the rest of my life ;D

[Im_convincedmjalive]

As these people exit the courthouse, can you see anyone who would strike you as possibly someone who would post what Back has posted?  Ramone Bain says Michael was not thinking future but totally focused on the trial. Wagener predicts that MJ would be acquitted months before he is because of faulty witnesses. They mostly look like white people, and I still think Back writes like a black man.[BBvideo 425,350:4uq12low]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YS27AFRbm50[/BBvideo:4uq12low]

Bleu, no I meant Nappy Head!

Starchild, yes I'm aware of the term. Like many phrases, it depends on how it's used. Being a Black American myself, I have called my fellow Black Americans "nappy". And vice versa. If you're doing it in a loving, playful, friendly way, that totally changes the context of it. The "nappy-headed hos" reference is insulting because of the WAY it was used.

I would never use that term in a derogatory way. And I am by FAR a racist. I hope I have cleared this up.

I am "Nappy" today myself! ------>  <!-- srr/ -->rr/<!-- srr/ -->

PEACE! --- to Nappy Heads and NON-Nappy Heads alike!

I am using Front's own post to speak for himself. I am curious though what does a black man write like?  :o :-X